pdml@pdml.net

Pentax-Discuss Mail List

View all threads

How do I correct an old image like this?

AS
ann sanfedele
Fri, Oct 1, 2021 9:06 PM

YEah I mentioned powder blue or aqua  before I read this.. which you
have not seen yet :-)
makes me ant to fiddle  again .. with the one JOhn C did I think

On 10/1/2021 4:17 PM, Gonz wrote:

More like "aquaish"

On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 3:16 PM Gonzrgonzomatic@gmail.com  wrote:

The stairs/wall were a light shade of blue.  The year was approximately 1968.

On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 2:21 PM ann sanfedeleannsan@nyc.rr.com  wrote:

ok Gonz so please do tell us (or at least me, maybe no one else cares)
when the photo was taken and what color were the walls IRL ?
the photo was taken with a flash, yes?

ann

On 10/1/2021 3:13 PM, Gonz wrote:

My scanner is an epson 4990. I guess I need to figure out how to get a
better scan first!  I did try to use some of the "advanced" features,
but obviously too low rez.

On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 2:37 AMjcoyle@iinet.net.au  wrote:

Hi Gonz - from your low-res Flickr image, I used the following process in PS:
Auto Tone
Auto Colour
Auto Contrast
Image Adjustments:
Brightness reduced
Contrast +10%
Shadows/Highlights:
Mid-Tones +15%

And then resized it to 300dpi
The result is at
www.epraxisdata.com/Img002_adjusted.jpg

not brilliant, but perhaps it would work better on a decent scan.

John in Brisbane

-----Original Message-----
From: Gonzrgonzomatic@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, 1 October 2021 1:52 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Subject: How do I correct an old image like this?

Scanned an old negative.  Played around with the usual knobs, but cant seem to get it to look decent.  There is not
enough dynamic range here it seems.  I've seen articles somewhere where they make old photos like this pop out almost to
new.  How does this work?

https://www.flickr.com/photos/66982297@N02/51535604096/in/dateposted/

--
--Gonz

%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email topdml-leave@pdml.net  to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and follow the directions.

%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email topdml-leave@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

--
ann sanfedele photography
https://annsan.smugmug.com
https://www.cafepress.com/+ann-sanfedele+gifts
https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/annsan
https://www.createphotocalendars.com/Shop/annsanfedelecalendarsandbooks

%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email topdml-leave@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

--
--Gonz

YEah I mentioned powder blue or aqua  before I read this.. which you have not seen yet :-) makes me ant to fiddle  again .. with the one JOhn C did I think On 10/1/2021 4:17 PM, Gonz wrote: > More like "aquaish" > > > On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 3:16 PM Gonz<rgonzomatic@gmail.com> wrote: >> The stairs/wall were a light shade of blue. The year was approximately 1968. >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 2:21 PM ann sanfedele<annsan@nyc.rr.com> wrote: >>> ok Gonz so please do tell us (or at least me, maybe no one else cares) >>> when the photo was taken and what color were the walls IRL ? >>> the photo was taken with a flash, yes? >>> >>> ann >>> >>> >>> >>> On 10/1/2021 3:13 PM, Gonz wrote: >>>> My scanner is an epson 4990. I guess I need to figure out how to get a >>>> better scan first! I did try to use some of the "advanced" features, >>>> but obviously too low rez. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 2:37 AM<jcoyle@iinet.net.au> wrote: >>>>> Hi Gonz - from your low-res Flickr image, I used the following process in PS: >>>>> Auto Tone >>>>> Auto Colour >>>>> Auto Contrast >>>>> Image Adjustments: >>>>> Brightness reduced >>>>> Contrast +10% >>>>> Shadows/Highlights: >>>>> Mid-Tones +15% >>>>> >>>>> And then resized it to 300dpi >>>>> The result is at >>>>> www.epraxisdata.com/Img002_adjusted.jpg >>>>> >>>>> not brilliant, but perhaps it would work better on a decent scan. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> John in Brisbane >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Gonz<rgonzomatic@gmail.com> >>>>> Sent: Friday, 1 October 2021 1:52 AM >>>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List<pdml@pdml.net> >>>>> Subject: How do I correct an old image like this? >>>>> >>>>> Scanned an old negative. Played around with the usual knobs, but cant seem to get it to look decent. There is not >>>>> enough dynamic range here it seems. I've seen articles somewhere where they make old photos like this pop out almost to >>>>> new. How does this work? >>>>> >>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/66982297@N02/51535604096/in/dateposted/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> --Gonz >>>>> -- >>>>> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>> To unsubscribe send an email topdml-leave@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above >>>>> and follow the directions. >>>>> -- >>>>> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>> To unsubscribe send an email topdml-leave@pdml.net >>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. >>> -- >>> ann sanfedele photography >>> https://annsan.smugmug.com >>> https://www.cafepress.com/+ann-sanfedele+gifts >>> https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/annsan >>> https://www.createphotocalendars.com/Shop/annsanfedelecalendarsandbooks >>> -- >>> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> To unsubscribe send an email topdml-leave@pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. >> >> -- >> --Gonz > -- ann sanfedele photography https://annsan.smugmug.com https://www.cafepress.com/+ann-sanfedele+gifts https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/annsan https://www.createphotocalendars.com/Shop/annsanfedelecalendarsandbooks
PS
Paul Stenquist
Fri, Oct 1, 2021 9:37 PM

In my experience the Epson software is far superior to Vuescan on an Epson flatbed. I get perfect scans with Rpson software on an Epson 850P. Same was true of earlier Epson flatbeds I own. I found it impossible to get good scans with Vuescan due to the clunkiness of its controls,

Paul

On Oct 1, 2021, at 4:01 PM, Ralf R Radermacher fotoralf@gmx.de wrote:

Am 01.10.21 um 21:13 schrieb Gonz:

My scanner is an epson 4990.

Nothing wrong with that. You might want to try the demo version of Vuescan:

http://www.hamrick.com

Ralf

--
Ralf R. Radermacher  -  Köln/Cologne, Germany
Blog  : http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com
Audio : http://aporee.org/maps/projects/fotoralf
Web  : http://www.fotoralf.de

%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

In my experience the Epson software is far superior to Vuescan on an Epson flatbed. I get perfect scans with Rpson software on an Epson 850P. Same was true of earlier Epson flatbeds I own. I found it impossible to get good scans with Vuescan due to the clunkiness of its controls, Paul > On Oct 1, 2021, at 4:01 PM, Ralf R Radermacher <fotoralf@gmx.de> wrote: > > Am 01.10.21 um 21:13 schrieb Gonz: >> My scanner is an epson 4990. > > Nothing wrong with that. You might want to try the demo version of Vuescan: > > http://www.hamrick.com > > Ralf > > -- > Ralf R. Radermacher - Köln/Cologne, Germany > Blog : http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com > Audio : http://aporee.org/maps/projects/fotoralf > Web : http://www.fotoralf.de > -- > %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List > To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
AS
ann sanfedele
Fri, Oct 1, 2021 9:39 PM

OK I played with the one John Coyle did and reversed it to the correct
orientation, worked on getting the aqua which gave the shirts they were
all wearing
a bit more believable a color.. but working with a print screen low res
image I couldn't do much ..

I work kinda free hand  don't record every tweak.. just go back and
forth until I see what I guessed would be closest to the original color.

https://annsan.smugmug.com/Other/Stuff-to-show-PDML-for-various/n-vWHWf/i-pPnjDZK/A

IT is fun doing this

ann

On 10/1/2021 5:06 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:

YEah I mentioned powder blue or aqua  before I read this.. which you
have not seen yet :-)
makes me ant to fiddle  again .. with the one JOhn C did I think

On 10/1/2021 4:17 PM, Gonz wrote:

More like "aquaish"

On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 3:16 PM Gonzrgonzomatic@gmail.com  wrote:

The stairs/wall were a light shade of blue.  The year was
approximately 1968.

On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 2:21 PM ann sanfedeleannsan@nyc.rr.com  wrote:

ok Gonz so please do tell us (or at least me, maybe no one else cares)
when the photo was taken and what color were the walls IRL ?
the photo was taken with a flash, yes?

ann

On 10/1/2021 3:13 PM, Gonz wrote:

My scanner is an epson 4990. I guess I need to figure out how to
get a
better scan first!  I did try to use some of the "advanced" features,
but obviously too low rez.

On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 2:37 AMjcoyle@iinet.net.au wrote:

Hi Gonz - from your low-res Flickr image, I used the following
process in PS:
Auto Tone
Auto Colour
Auto Contrast
Image Adjustments:
Brightness reduced
Contrast +10%
Shadows/Highlights:
Mid-Tones +15%

And then resized it to 300dpi
The result is at
www.epraxisdata.com/Img002_adjusted.jpg

not brilliant, but perhaps it would work better on a decent scan.

John in Brisbane

-----Original Message-----
From: Gonzrgonzomatic@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, 1 October 2021 1:52 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Subject: How do I correct an old image like this?

Scanned an old negative.  Played around with the usual knobs, but
cant seem to get it to look decent.  There is not
enough dynamic range here it seems.  I've seen articles somewhere
where they make old photos like this pop out almost to
new.  How does this work?

https://www.flickr.com/photos/66982297@N02/51535604096/in/dateposted/

--
   --Gonz

%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email topdml-leave@pdml.net  to
UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and follow the directions.

%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email topdml-leave@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
above and follow the directions.

--
ann sanfedele photography
https://annsan.smugmug.com
https://www.cafepress.com/+ann-sanfedele+gifts
https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/annsan
https://www.createphotocalendars.com/Shop/annsanfedelecalendarsandbooks

--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email topdml-leave@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and follow the directions.

--
  --Gonz

OK I played with the one John Coyle did and reversed it to the correct orientation, worked on getting the aqua which gave the shirts they were all wearing a bit more believable a color.. but working with a print screen low res image I couldn't do much .. I work kinda free hand  don't record every tweak.. just go back and forth until I see what I guessed would be closest to the original color. https://annsan.smugmug.com/Other/Stuff-to-show-PDML-for-various/n-vWHWf/i-pPnjDZK/A IT is fun doing this ann On 10/1/2021 5:06 PM, ann sanfedele wrote: > YEah I mentioned powder blue or aqua  before I read this.. which you > have not seen yet :-) > makes me ant to fiddle  again .. with the one JOhn C did I think > > > > On 10/1/2021 4:17 PM, Gonz wrote: >> More like "aquaish" >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 3:16 PM Gonz<rgonzomatic@gmail.com>  wrote: >>> The stairs/wall were a light shade of blue.  The year was >>> approximately 1968. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 2:21 PM ann sanfedele<annsan@nyc.rr.com>  wrote: >>>> ok Gonz so please do tell us (or at least me, maybe no one else cares) >>>> when the photo was taken and what color were the walls IRL ? >>>> the photo was taken with a flash, yes? >>>> >>>> ann >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 10/1/2021 3:13 PM, Gonz wrote: >>>>> My scanner is an epson 4990. I guess I need to figure out how to >>>>> get a >>>>> better scan first!  I did try to use some of the "advanced" features, >>>>> but obviously too low rez. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 2:37 AM<jcoyle@iinet.net.au> wrote: >>>>>> Hi Gonz - from your low-res Flickr image, I used the following >>>>>> process in PS: >>>>>> Auto Tone >>>>>> Auto Colour >>>>>> Auto Contrast >>>>>> Image Adjustments: >>>>>> Brightness reduced >>>>>> Contrast +10% >>>>>> Shadows/Highlights: >>>>>> Mid-Tones +15% >>>>>> >>>>>> And then resized it to 300dpi >>>>>> The result is at >>>>>> www.epraxisdata.com/Img002_adjusted.jpg >>>>>> >>>>>> not brilliant, but perhaps it would work better on a decent scan. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> John in Brisbane >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Gonz<rgonzomatic@gmail.com> >>>>>> Sent: Friday, 1 October 2021 1:52 AM >>>>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List<pdml@pdml.net> >>>>>> Subject: How do I correct an old image like this? >>>>>> >>>>>> Scanned an old negative.  Played around with the usual knobs, but >>>>>> cant seem to get it to look decent.  There is not >>>>>> enough dynamic range here it seems.  I've seen articles somewhere >>>>>> where they make old photos like this pop out almost to >>>>>> new.  How does this work? >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/66982297@N02/51535604096/in/dateposted/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>>    --Gonz >>>>>> -- >>>>>> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email topdml-leave@pdml.net  to >>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above >>>>>> and follow the directions. >>>>>> -- >>>>>> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email topdml-leave@pdml.net >>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly >>>>>> above and follow the directions. >>>> -- >>>> ann sanfedele photography >>>> https://annsan.smugmug.com >>>> https://www.cafepress.com/+ann-sanfedele+gifts >>>> https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/annsan >>>> https://www.createphotocalendars.com/Shop/annsanfedelecalendarsandbooks >>>> >>>> -- >>>> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> To unsubscribe send an email topdml-leave@pdml.net >>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above >>>> and follow the directions. >>> >>> -- >>>   --Gonz >> > -- ann sanfedele photography https://annsan.smugmug.com https://www.cafepress.com/+ann-sanfedele+gifts https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/annsan https://www.createphotocalendars.com/Shop/annsanfedelecalendarsandbooks
GD
Godfrey DiGiorgi
Fri, Oct 1, 2021 11:31 PM

Hmm. I get excellent scans out of both my Epson scanners with Vuescan. The Epson software has a couple of other things it does well and I use it for those, but for the best image quality when scanning transparencies or negatives I always use Vuescan.

In the end, whatever works best for you is all that matters... :)

G

On Oct 1, 2021, at 2:37 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenquist@mac.com wrote:

In my experience the Epson software is far superior to Vuescan on an Epson flatbed. I get perfect scans with Rpson software on an Epson 850P. Same was true of earlier Epson flatbeds I own. I found it impossible to get good scans with Vuescan due to the clunkiness of its controls,

Paul

On Oct 1, 2021, at 4:01 PM, Ralf R Radermacher fotoralf@gmx.de wrote:

Am 01.10.21 um 21:13 schrieb Gonz:

My scanner is an epson 4990.

Nothing wrong with that. You might want to try the demo version of Vuescan:

http://www.hamrick.com

Ralf

Hmm. I get excellent scans out of both my Epson scanners with Vuescan. The Epson software has a couple of other things it does well and I use it for those, but for the best image quality when scanning transparencies or negatives I always use Vuescan. In the end, whatever works best for you is all that matters... :) G > On Oct 1, 2021, at 2:37 PM, Paul Stenquist <pnstenquist@mac.com> wrote: > > In my experience the Epson software is far superior to Vuescan on an Epson flatbed. I get perfect scans with Rpson software on an Epson 850P. Same was true of earlier Epson flatbeds I own. I found it impossible to get good scans with Vuescan due to the clunkiness of its controls, > > Paul > >> On Oct 1, 2021, at 4:01 PM, Ralf R Radermacher <fotoralf@gmx.de> wrote: >> >> Am 01.10.21 um 21:13 schrieb Gonz: >>> My scanner is an epson 4990. >> >> Nothing wrong with that. You might want to try the demo version of Vuescan: >> >> http://www.hamrick.com >> >> Ralf
J
jcoyle@iinet.net.au
Sat, Oct 2, 2021 1:33 AM

I tend to agree with Paul - I've used VueScan for donkey's years, on a number of scanners, and still am not entirely comfortable with the interface.  I prefer to deal, for example,  with dust spots post the scan, but VueScan has a tool to do them during the scan: this often leads to a softer image than I would want. The Epson software is good (Perfection V500 with all updates).

John in Brisbane

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Stenquist pnstenquist@mac.com
Sent: Saturday, 2 October 2021 7:38 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: How do I correct an old image like this?

In my experience the Epson software is far superior to Vuescan on an Epson flatbed. I get perfect scans with Rpson software on an Epson 850P. Same was true of earlier Epson flatbeds I own. I found it impossible to get good scans with Vuescan due to the clunkiness of its controls,

Paul

On Oct 1, 2021, at 4:01 PM, Ralf R Radermacher fotoralf@gmx.de wrote:

Am 01.10.21 um 21:13 schrieb Gonz:

My scanner is an epson 4990.

Nothing wrong with that. You might want to try the demo version of Vuescan:

http://www.hamrick.com

Ralf

--
Ralf R. Radermacher  -  Köln/Cologne, Germany Blog  :
http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com
Audio : http://aporee.org/maps/projects/fotoralf
Web  : http://www.fotoralf.de

%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to
pdml-leave@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
link directly above and follow the directions.

--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

I tend to agree with Paul - I've used VueScan for donkey's years, on a number of scanners, and still am not entirely comfortable with the interface. I prefer to deal, for example, with dust spots post the scan, but VueScan has a tool to do them during the scan: this often leads to a softer image than I would want. The Epson software is good (Perfection V500 with all updates). John in Brisbane -----Original Message----- From: Paul Stenquist <pnstenquist@mac.com> Sent: Saturday, 2 October 2021 7:38 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> Subject: Re: How do I correct an old image like this? In my experience the Epson software is far superior to Vuescan on an Epson flatbed. I get perfect scans with Rpson software on an Epson 850P. Same was true of earlier Epson flatbeds I own. I found it impossible to get good scans with Vuescan due to the clunkiness of its controls, Paul > On Oct 1, 2021, at 4:01 PM, Ralf R Radermacher <fotoralf@gmx.de> wrote: > > Am 01.10.21 um 21:13 schrieb Gonz: >> My scanner is an epson 4990. > > Nothing wrong with that. You might want to try the demo version of Vuescan: > > http://www.hamrick.com > > Ralf > > -- > Ralf R. Radermacher - Köln/Cologne, Germany Blog : > http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com > Audio : http://aporee.org/maps/projects/fotoralf > Web : http://www.fotoralf.de > -- > %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to > pdml-leave@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the > link directly above and follow the directions. -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
SC
Steve Cottrell
Sun, Oct 3, 2021 7:45 PM

Gonz - some more mgic for you mate. My take:

http://www.seeingeye.tv/pages/spare.html

Cot

On 1 Oct 2021, at 20:10, Gonz rgonzomatic@gmail.com wrote:

Man you guys are wizards.  I haven't a clue as to how to perform this
kind of magic.

Gonz - some more mgic for you mate. My take: http://www.seeingeye.tv/pages/spare.html Cot On 1 Oct 2021, at 20:10, Gonz <rgonzomatic@gmail.com> wrote: Man you guys are wizards. I haven't a clue as to how to perform this kind of magic.
MC
Mark C
Sun, Oct 3, 2021 8:23 PM

Hi Gonz -

I pulled your photo into Photoshop CS6, cropped out the margins and then
applied auto colors. After that, slightly darkened the midtones in
levels. The result:

https://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/old-photo-touchup?blog=9

It's hard to judge the colors - skin tones, the wooden chair back, the
wooden picture frames look OK and the ceiling in the upper right is
white, which seems logical. If there was something in the image that I
knew was gray I'd open levels and click on it with the midtone
eyedropper. That usually helps restore color balance.

I inherited a bunch of very old faded prints a few years ago, and it was
amaze how much info would pop out of them just using auto color.

Mark

On 9/30/2021 11:52 AM, Gonz wrote:

Scanned an old negative.  Played around with the usual knobs, but cant
seem to get it to look decent.  There is not enough dynamic range here
it seems.  I've seen articles somewhere where they make old photos
like this pop out almost to new.  How does this work?

https://www.flickr.com/photos/66982297@N02/51535604096/in/dateposted/

Hi Gonz - I pulled your photo into Photoshop CS6, cropped out the margins and then applied auto colors. After that, slightly darkened the midtones in levels. The result: https://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/old-photo-touchup?blog=9 It's hard to judge the colors - skin tones, the wooden chair back, the wooden picture frames look OK and the ceiling in the upper right is white, which seems logical. If there was something in the image that I knew was gray I'd open levels and click on it with the midtone eyedropper. That usually helps restore color balance. I inherited a bunch of very old faded prints a few years ago, and it was amaze how much info would pop out of them just using auto color. Mark On 9/30/2021 11:52 AM, Gonz wrote: > Scanned an old negative. Played around with the usual knobs, but cant > seem to get it to look decent. There is not enough dynamic range here > it seems. I've seen articles somewhere where they make old photos > like this pop out almost to new. How does this work? > > https://www.flickr.com/photos/66982297@N02/51535604096/in/dateposted/ > >
AS
ann sanfedele
Sun, Oct 3, 2021 10:15 PM

Mark - Gonz said the walls were aqua...  I fiddled with my take until I
got an aqua wall ..
whiich I link again here just to point out that I took a screen shot of
Godder's work because he had flipped the picture to get
the correct view but lost clarity by messing with it too much..

https://annsan.smugmug.com/Other/Stuff-to-show-PDML-for-various/n-vWHWf/i-pPnjDZK/A

On 10/3/2021 4:23 PM, Mark C wrote:

Hi Gonz -

I pulled your photo into Photoshop CS6, cropped out the margins and
then applied auto colors. After that, slightly darkened the midtones
in levels. The result:

https://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/old-photo-touchup?blog=9

It's hard to judge the colors - skin tones, the wooden chair back, the
wooden picture frames look OK and the ceiling in the upper right is
white, which seems logical. If there was something in the image that I
knew was gray I'd open levels and click on it with the midtone
eyedropper. That usually helps restore color balance.

I inherited a bunch of very old faded prints a few years ago, and it
was amaze how much info would pop out of them just using auto color.

Mark

On 9/30/2021 11:52 AM, Gonz wrote:

%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.

Mark - Gonz said the walls were aqua...  I fiddled with my take until I got an aqua wall .. whiich I link again here just to point out that I took a screen shot of Godder's work because he had flipped the picture to get the correct view but lost clarity by messing with it too much.. https://annsan.smugmug.com/Other/Stuff-to-show-PDML-for-various/n-vWHWf/i-pPnjDZK/A On 10/3/2021 4:23 PM, Mark C wrote: > Hi Gonz - > > I pulled your photo into Photoshop CS6, cropped out the margins and > then applied auto colors. After that, slightly darkened the midtones > in levels. The result: > > https://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/old-photo-touchup?blog=9 > > > It's hard to judge the colors - skin tones, the wooden chair back, the > wooden picture frames look OK and the ceiling in the upper right is > white, which seems logical. If there was something in the image that I > knew was gray I'd open levels and click on it with the midtone > eyedropper. That usually helps restore color balance. > > I inherited a bunch of very old faded prints a few years ago, and it > was amaze how much info would pop out of them just using auto color. > > Mark > > On 9/30/2021 11:52 AM, Gonz wrote: >> >> https://www.flickr.com/photos/66982297@N02/51535604096/in/dateposted/ -- > %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List > To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- ann sanfedele photography https://annsan.smugmug.com https://www.cafepress.com/+ann-sanfedele+gifts https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/annsan https://www.createphotocalendars.com/Shop/annsanfedelecalendarsandbooks
G
Gonz
Sun, Oct 3, 2021 11:24 PM

Hi Mark,

Thanks for taking a shot at it!  That's probably really close.  The
stair color was "aqua". I don't know if anything there was gray.  But
your skin tones look pretty spot on.

On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 3:23 PM Mark C pdml-mark@charter.net wrote:

Hi Gonz -

I pulled your photo into Photoshop CS6, cropped out the margins and then
applied auto colors. After that, slightly darkened the midtones in
levels. The result:

https://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/old-photo-touchup?blog=9

It's hard to judge the colors - skin tones, the wooden chair back, the
wooden picture frames look OK and the ceiling in the upper right is
white, which seems logical. If there was something in the image that I
knew was gray I'd open levels and click on it with the midtone
eyedropper. That usually helps restore color balance.

I inherited a bunch of very old faded prints a few years ago, and it was
amaze how much info would pop out of them just using auto color.

Mark

On 9/30/2021 11:52 AM, Gonz wrote:

Scanned an old negative.  Played around with the usual knobs, but cant
seem to get it to look decent.  There is not enough dynamic range here
it seems.  I've seen articles somewhere where they make old photos
like this pop out almost to new.  How does this work?

https://www.flickr.com/photos/66982297@N02/51535604096/in/dateposted/

--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

--
--Gonz

Hi Mark, Thanks for taking a shot at it! That's probably really close. The stair color was "aqua". I don't know if anything there was gray. But your skin tones look pretty spot on. On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 3:23 PM Mark C <pdml-mark@charter.net> wrote: > > Hi Gonz - > > I pulled your photo into Photoshop CS6, cropped out the margins and then > applied auto colors. After that, slightly darkened the midtones in > levels. The result: > > https://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/old-photo-touchup?blog=9 > > It's hard to judge the colors - skin tones, the wooden chair back, the > wooden picture frames look OK and the ceiling in the upper right is > white, which seems logical. If there was something in the image that I > knew was gray I'd open levels and click on it with the midtone > eyedropper. That usually helps restore color balance. > > I inherited a bunch of very old faded prints a few years ago, and it was > amaze how much info would pop out of them just using auto color. > > Mark > > On 9/30/2021 11:52 AM, Gonz wrote: > > Scanned an old negative. Played around with the usual knobs, but cant > > seem to get it to look decent. There is not enough dynamic range here > > it seems. I've seen articles somewhere where they make old photos > > like this pop out almost to new. How does this work? > > > > https://www.flickr.com/photos/66982297@N02/51535604096/in/dateposted/ > > > > > -- > %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List > To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- --Gonz
J
John
Sun, Oct 3, 2021 11:32 PM

I think it's something you should be able to fix during the scan.

I use Vuescan. I have version 9 x64 (9.6.24) and it has tools to do the color
correction during the scan.

https://www.hamrick.com/

I highly recommend it. Once you pay for it, you get "free" updates for life (I'm
guessing HIS lifetime).

It's up to version 9.7 but I haven't been scanning much lately, and hadn't
bothered to check for the latest update.

On 9/30/2021 11:52:06, Gonz wrote:

Scanned an old negative.  Played around with the usual knobs, but cant
seem to get it to look decent.  There is not enough dynamic range here
it seems.  I've seen articles somewhere where they make old photos
like this pop out almost to new.  How does this work?

https://www.flickr.com/photos/66982297@N02/51535604096/in/dateposted/

--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

I think it's something you should be able to fix during the scan. I use Vuescan. I have version 9 x64 (9.6.24) and it has tools to do the color correction during the scan. https://www.hamrick.com/ I highly recommend it. Once you pay for it, you get "free" updates for life (I'm guessing HIS lifetime). It's up to version 9.7 but I haven't been scanning much lately, and hadn't bothered to check for the latest update. On 9/30/2021 11:52:06, Gonz wrote: > Scanned an old negative. Played around with the usual knobs, but cant > seem to get it to look decent. There is not enough dynamic range here > it seems. I've seen articles somewhere where they make old photos > like this pop out almost to new. How does this work? > > https://www.flickr.com/photos/66982297@N02/51535604096/in/dateposted/ > > -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question.