It is easy by distorting to adjust this in photoshop or similar.
I hope not getting nightmares to sit on the other side of such fence.
Henk
Op 2021-06-12 om 05:29 schreef John Francis:
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 10:10:45PM -0400, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Nice image. I agree that the "rotated" image looks a bit better.
Dan Matyola
I have to disagree.
while the rotation gets the iron bars more vertical/horizontal,
it does exactly the opposite for the grid of smaller squares
and for the (wooden?) upright at the left edge of the frame.
My eye picks out that upright (and the somewhat lighter vertical
near the middle of the frame), and I prefer the unrotated image.
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
It is easy by distorting to adjust this in photoshop or similar.
I hope not getting nightmares to sit on the other side of such fence.
Henk
Op 2021-06-12 om 05:29 schreef John Francis:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 10:10:45PM -0400, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>> Nice image. I agree that the "rotated" image looks a bit better.
>>
>> Dan Matyola
> I have to disagree.
>
> while the rotation gets the iron bars more vertical/horizontal,
> it does exactly the opposite for the grid of smaller squares
> and for the (wooden?) upright at the left edge of the frame.
>
> My eye picks out that upright (and the somewhat lighter vertical
> near the middle of the frame), and I prefer the unrotated image.
> --
> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
