Actually no. We usually made large blowups on poster board of the most important images. I never made any marking on my photos and spoke from memory about the relevance of each particular image. At one trial, I had a juror approach me about obtaining one of my images - it was an extreme close up of a rust pattern - quite abstract. It was not unusual to shoot 3 to 5 rolls of 36 exposure film - always a Kodak color print stock. -----Original Message----- >From: John <jsessoms002@nc.rr.com> >Sent: Feb 15, 2021 4:25 PM >To: pdml@pdml.net >Subject: Re: OT: Photo Forensics > >What? No color glossy photos with circles & arrows and a paragraph on the back >of each one explaining what they were about? > >On 2/15/2021 13:05:46, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: >> Ken: >> I have admitted photographs into evidence at trial many times over the past >> 46 years. The legal standard, as you stated is that the witness (whether >> the photographer or another person) must testify that the photograph is a >> fair and accurate representation of the scene, object or person depicted at >> the time in question. >> >> Dan Matyola >> Dan Matyola >> *https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery >> <https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery>* > > > >-- >Science - Questions we may never find answers for. >Religion - Answers we must never question. >-- >%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List >To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net >to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

I guess John can’t always get anything he wants. > On Feb 15, 2021, at 1:39 PM, Ken Waller <kwaller@peoplepc.com> wrote: > > Actually no. We usually made large blowups on poster board of the most important images. > I never made any marking on my photos and spoke from memory about the relevance of each particular image. > > At one trial, I had a juror approach me about obtaining one of my images - it was an extreme close up of a rust pattern - quite abstract. > > It was not unusual to shoot 3 to 5 rolls of 36 exposure film - always a Kodak color print stock. > > -----Original Message----- >> From: John <jsessoms002@nc.rr.com> >> Sent: Feb 15, 2021 4:25 PM >> To: pdml@pdml.net >> Subject: Re: OT: Photo Forensics >> >> What? No color glossy photos with circles & arrows and a paragraph on the back >> of each one explaining what they were about? >> >> On 2/15/2021 13:05:46, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: >>> Ken: >>> I have admitted photographs into evidence at trial many times over the past >>> 46 years. The legal standard, as you stated is that the witness (whether >>> the photographer or another person) must testify that the photograph is a >>> fair and accurate representation of the scene, object or person depicted at >>> the time in question. >>> -- Larry Colen lrc@red4est.com

At least YOU understood the joke. On 2/15/2021 16:42:20, Larry Colen wrote: > I guess John can’t always get anything he wants. > > > >> On Feb 15, 2021, at 1:39 PM, Ken Waller <kwaller@peoplepc.com> wrote: >> >> Actually no. We usually made large blowups on poster board of the most important images. >> I never made any marking on my photos and spoke from memory about the relevance of each particular image. >> >> At one trial, I had a juror approach me about obtaining one of my images - it was an extreme close up of a rust pattern - quite abstract. >> >> It was not unusual to shoot 3 to 5 rolls of 36 exposure film - always a Kodak color print stock. >> >> -----Original Message----- >>> From: John <jsessoms002@nc.rr.com> >>> Sent: Feb 15, 2021 4:25 PM >>> To: pdml@pdml.net >>> Subject: Re: OT: Photo Forensics >>> >>> What? No color glossy photos with circles & arrows and a paragraph on the back >>> of each one explaining what they were about? >>> >>> On 2/15/2021 13:05:46, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: >>>> Ken: >>>> I have admitted photographs into evidence at trial many times over the past >>>> 46 years. The legal standard, as you stated is that the witness (whether >>>> the photographer or another person) must testify that the photograph is a >>>> fair and accurate representation of the scene, object or person depicted at >>>> the time in question. >>>> > > -- > Larry Colen > lrc@red4est.com > -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question.

Sorry to have taken you seriously, John. Dan Matyola On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 10:26 PM John <jsessoms002@nc.rr.com> wrote: > At least YOU understood the joke. > > On 2/15/2021 16:42:20, Larry Colen wrote: > > I guess John can’t always get anything he wants. > > > > > > > >> On Feb 15, 2021, at 1:39 PM, Ken Waller <kwaller@peoplepc.com> wrote: > >> > >> Actually no. We usually made large blowups on poster board of the most > important images. > >> I never made any marking on my photos and spoke from memory about the > relevance of each particular image. > >> > >> At one trial, I had a juror approach me about obtaining one of my > images - it was an extreme close up of a rust pattern - quite abstract. > >> > >> It was not unusual to shoot 3 to 5 rolls of 36 exposure film - always a > Kodak color print stock. > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: John <jsessoms002@nc.rr.com> > >>> Sent: Feb 15, 2021 4:25 PM > >>> To: pdml@pdml.net > >>> Subject: Re: OT: Photo Forensics > >>> > >>> What? No color glossy photos with circles & arrows and a paragraph on > the back > >>> of each one explaining what they were about? > >>> > >>> On 2/15/2021 13:05:46, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: > >>>> Ken: > >>>> I have admitted photographs into evidence at trial many times over > the past > >>>> 46 years. The legal standard, as you stated is that the witness > (whether > >>>> the photographer or another person) must testify that the photograph > is a > >>>> fair and accurate representation of the scene, object or person > depicted at > >>>> the time in question. > >>>> > > > > -- > > Larry Colen > > lrc@red4est.com > > > > > > -- > Science - Questions we may never find answers for. > Religion - Answers we must never question. > -- > %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List > To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions.