I think the differences are pretty subtle. As I understand it the mk ii had lower noise at higher iso by doing some processing on the raw that reduces detail.
It's supposed to have better focusing with longer lenses.
I think that the differences only matter in specific use cases
On February 23, 2024 9:12:13 AM PST, John Sessoms jsessoms002@nc.rr.com wrote:
What are the differences?
--
Vivere in aeternum aut mori conatur
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
www.avg.com
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
I think the differences are pretty subtle. As I understand it the mk ii had lower noise at higher iso by doing some processing on the raw that reduces detail.
It's supposed to have better focusing with longer lenses.
I think that the differences only matter in specific use cases
On February 23, 2024 9:12:13 AM PST, John Sessoms <jsessoms002@nc.rr.com> wrote:
>What are the differences?
>
>--
>Vivere in aeternum aut mori conatur
>
>--
>This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
>www.avg.com
>--
>%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
>to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
>
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
