On 17/10/2025 03:03 BST ann sanfedele annsan@nyc.rr.com wrote:
oy..
rectify
On 10/16/2025 9:18 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Ann,
So you weren't able to moon us this time, I have every bit of faith of
you being able to rectify that when you put your mind to it.
On 2025-10-16 18:15, ann sanfedele wrote:
YUp - I found that out later on line .. and Larry and Bob both
mentioned lens flare.. when I first posted the photo to
my friends I mentioend I wasn't sure if it was a real moon or
something to do with the camera.. I had wondered about a blob on my
lens
Lens flare it are :-)
ann
On 10/16/2025 8:45 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
And on 16 October 2010 It was a "Waxing Gibbous" (71.13% Visible)
moon; rose at 3:18 PM and set at 1:24 AM, so not visible from
Toronto at just after 8:00 AM.
The cheek.
> On 17/10/2025 03:03 BST ann sanfedele <annsan@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
>
>
> oy..
> _rectify_
>
> On 10/16/2025 9:18 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> > Ann,
> > So you weren't able to moon us this time, I have every bit of faith of
> > you being able to rectify that when you put your mind to it.
> >
> >
> > On 2025-10-16 18:15, ann sanfedele wrote:
> >> YUp - I found that out later on line .. and Larry and Bob both
> >> mentioned lens flare.. when I first posted the photo to
> >> my friends I mentioend I wasn't sure if it was a real moon or
> >> something to do with the camera.. I had wondered about a blob on my
> >> lens
> >> Lens flare it are :-)
> >>
> >> ann
> >>
> >> On 10/16/2025 8:45 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
> >>> And on 16 October 2010 It was a "Waxing Gibbous" (71.13% Visible)
> >>> moon; rose at 3:18 PM and set at 1:24 AM, so not visible from
> >>> Toronto at just after 8:00 AM.
> >>>
> >