KW
Ken Waller
Thu, Sep 30, 2021 4:27 PM
Wasn't considering this a debate just a statement of the "facts" as I am aware of.
Ken Waller
-----Original Message-----
From: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Sent: Sep 29, 2021 6:42 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: GESO British car show
On Sep 29, 2021, at 3:09 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
Actually the XKE first went on sale in1961, so I'm guessing it's intro was preceded by at least 2 to 3 years for design and development.
Yeah, the e type was a tamed down xkss from 1957, the Honda Odyssey dates from 1994, but yeah, whether we’re talking 40, 50 or 60 years of development, those were a critical few decades, if only for the roles that computers were able to play starting in the 80’s not only in design but in engine and brake management.
It would almost seem as if we are 98% in agreement and vigorously debating a superfluous 2% of the question. Fortunately, that doesn’t happen very often.
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Wasn't considering this a debate just a statement of the "facts" as I am aware of.
Ken Waller
-----Original Message-----
From: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Sent: Sep 29, 2021 6:42 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: GESO British car show
> On Sep 29, 2021, at 3:09 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
>
> Actually the XKE first went on sale in1961, so I'm guessing it's intro was preceded by at least 2 to 3 years for design and development.
Yeah, the e type was a tamed down xkss from 1957, the Honda Odyssey dates from 1994, but yeah, whether we’re talking 40, 50 or 60 years of development, those were a critical few decades, if only for the roles that computers were able to play starting in the 80’s not only in design but in engine and brake management.
It would almost seem as if we are 98% in agreement and vigorously debating a superfluous 2% of the question. Fortunately, that doesn’t happen very often.
--
Larry Colen
lrc@red4est.com
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
PS
Paul Stenquist
Thu, Sep 30, 2021 4:48 PM
Jaguar positioned the E-Type as the successor to the D-Type race car, not the XKSS, and it featured many upgrades, most notably the independent rear suspension. The most significant shared nature was the subframe/rigid body unit construction. The XKSS was a limited production streetable version of the D-Type. Only 16 copies of the XKSS were built of the original production run of 25. Nine were destroyed in the Borwn’s Lane fire of 1957. It didn’t incorporate any of the advances that later appeared on the E-Type. The XKE name was used only on E-Type cars sold in the United States.
On Sep 30, 2021, at 12:27 PM, Ken Waller kwaller@peoplepc.com wrote:
Wasn't considering this a debate just a statement of the "facts" as I am aware of.
Ken Waller
-----Original Message-----
From: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Sent: Sep 29, 2021 6:42 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: GESO British car show
On Sep 29, 2021, at 3:09 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
Actually the XKE first went on sale in1961, so I'm guessing it's intro was preceded by at least 2 to 3 years for design and development.
Yeah, the e type was a tamed down xkss from 1957, the Honda Odyssey dates from 1994, but yeah, whether we’re talking 40, 50 or 60 years of development, those were a critical few decades, if only for the roles that computers were able to play starting in the 80’s not only in design but in engine and brake management.
It would almost seem as if we are 98% in agreement and vigorously debating a superfluous 2% of the question. Fortunately, that doesn’t happen very often.
--
Larry Colen
lrc@red4est.com
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Jaguar positioned the E-Type as the successor to the D-Type race car, not the XKSS, and it featured many upgrades, most notably the independent rear suspension. The most significant shared nature was the subframe/rigid body unit construction. The XKSS was a limited production streetable version of the D-Type. Only 16 copies of the XKSS were built of the original production run of 25. Nine were destroyed in the Borwn’s Lane fire of 1957. It didn’t incorporate any of the advances that later appeared on the E-Type. The XKE name was used only on E-Type cars sold in the United States.
> On Sep 30, 2021, at 12:27 PM, Ken Waller <kwaller@peoplepc.com> wrote:
>
> Wasn't considering this a debate just a statement of the "facts" as I am aware of.
>
>
> Ken Waller
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Sent: Sep 29, 2021 6:42 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: GESO British car show
>
>
>
>> On Sep 29, 2021, at 3:09 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
>>
>> Actually the XKE first went on sale in1961, so I'm guessing it's intro was preceded by at least 2 to 3 years for design and development.
>
> Yeah, the e type was a tamed down xkss from 1957, the Honda Odyssey dates from 1994, but yeah, whether we’re talking 40, 50 or 60 years of development, those were a critical few decades, if only for the roles that computers were able to play starting in the 80’s not only in design but in engine and brake management.
>
> It would almost seem as if we are 98% in agreement and vigorously debating a superfluous 2% of the question. Fortunately, that doesn’t happen very often.
>
>
>
> --
> Larry Colen
> lrc@red4est.com
>
>
> --
> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
>
>
> --
> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
MW
mike wilson
Thu, Sep 30, 2021 11:01 PM
On 30 September 2021 at 17:48 Paul Stenquist pnstenquist@comcast.net wrote:
Jaguar positioned the E-Type as the successor to the D-Type race car, not the XKSS, and it featured many upgrades, most notably the independent rear suspension. The most significant shared nature was the subframe/rigid body unit construction. The XKSS was a limited production streetable version of the D-Type. Only 16 copies of the XKSS were built of the original production run of 25. Nine were destroyed in the Borwn’s Lane fire of 1957. It didn’t incorporate any of the advances that later appeared on the E-Type. The XKE name was used only on E-Type cars sold in the United States.
On Sep 30, 2021, at 12:27 PM, Ken Waller kwaller@peoplepc.com wrote:
Wasn't considering this a debate just a statement of the "facts" as I am aware of.
Ken Waller
-----Original Message-----
From: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Sent: Sep 29, 2021 6:42 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: GESO British car show
On Sep 29, 2021, at 3:09 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
Actually the XKE first went on sale in1961, so I'm guessing it's intro was preceded by at least 2 to 3 years for design and development.
Yeah, the e type was a tamed down xkss from 1957, the Honda Odyssey dates from 1994, but yeah, whether we’re talking 40, 50 or 60 years of development, those were a critical few decades, if only for the roles that computers were able to play starting in the 80’s not only in design but in engine and brake management.
It would almost seem as if we are 98% in agreement and vigorously debating a superfluous 2% of the question. Fortunately, that doesn’t happen very often.
It would have been perfect, if only it had a....
https://youtu.be/MXW0bx_Ooq4
> On 30 September 2021 at 17:48 Paul Stenquist <pnstenquist@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
> Jaguar positioned the E-Type as the successor to the D-Type race car, not the XKSS, and it featured many upgrades, most notably the independent rear suspension. The most significant shared nature was the subframe/rigid body unit construction. The XKSS was a limited production streetable version of the D-Type. Only 16 copies of the XKSS were built of the original production run of 25. Nine were destroyed in the Borwn’s Lane fire of 1957. It didn’t incorporate any of the advances that later appeared on the E-Type. The XKE name was used only on E-Type cars sold in the United States.
>
> > On Sep 30, 2021, at 12:27 PM, Ken Waller <kwaller@peoplepc.com> wrote:
> >
> > Wasn't considering this a debate just a statement of the "facts" as I am aware of.
> >
> >
> > Ken Waller
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > Sent: Sep 29, 2021 6:42 PM
> > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > Subject: Re: GESO British car show
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Sep 29, 2021, at 3:09 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
> >>
> >> Actually the XKE first went on sale in1961, so I'm guessing it's intro was preceded by at least 2 to 3 years for design and development.
> >
> > Yeah, the e type was a tamed down xkss from 1957, the Honda Odyssey dates from 1994, but yeah, whether we’re talking 40, 50 or 60 years of development, those were a critical few decades, if only for the roles that computers were able to play starting in the 80’s not only in design but in engine and brake management.
> >
> > It would almost seem as if we are 98% in agreement and vigorously debating a superfluous 2% of the question. Fortunately, that doesn’t happen very often.
L
lrc@red4est.com
Fri, Oct 1, 2021 1:29 AM
At least it didn't have a Lucas interocitor.
On September 30, 2021 4:01:53 PM PDT, mike wilson m.9.wilson@ntlworld.com wrote:
On 30 September 2021 at 17:48 Paul Stenquist pnstenquist@comcast.net wrote:
Jaguar positioned the E-Type as the successor to the D-Type race car, not the XKSS, and it featured many upgrades, most notably the independent rear suspension. The most significant shared nature was the subframe/rigid body unit construction. The XKSS was a limited production streetable version of the D-Type. Only 16 copies of the XKSS were built of the original production run of 25. Nine were destroyed in the Borwn’s Lane fire of 1957. It didn’t incorporate any of the advances that later appeared on the E-Type. The XKE name was used only on E-Type cars sold in the United States.
On Sep 30, 2021, at 12:27 PM, Ken Waller kwaller@peoplepc.com wrote:
Wasn't considering this a debate just a statement of the "facts" as I am aware of.
Ken Waller
-----Original Message-----
From: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Sent: Sep 29, 2021 6:42 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: GESO British car show
On Sep 29, 2021, at 3:09 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
Actually the XKE first went on sale in1961, so I'm guessing it's intro was preceded by at least 2 to 3 years for design and development.
Yeah, the e type was a tamed down xkss from 1957, the Honda Odyssey dates from 1994, but yeah, whether we’re talking 40, 50 or 60 years of development, those were a critical few decades, if only for the roles that computers were able to play starting in the 80’s not only in design but in engine and brake management.
It would almost seem as if we are 98% in agreement and vigorously debating a superfluous 2% of the question. Fortunately, that doesn’t happen very often.
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
At least it didn't have a Lucas interocitor.
On September 30, 2021 4:01:53 PM PDT, mike wilson <m.9.wilson@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>It would have been perfect, if only it had a....
>
>https://youtu.be/MXW0bx_Ooq4
>
>> On 30 September 2021 at 17:48 Paul Stenquist <pnstenquist@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Jaguar positioned the E-Type as the successor to the D-Type race car, not the XKSS, and it featured many upgrades, most notably the independent rear suspension. The most significant shared nature was the subframe/rigid body unit construction. The XKSS was a limited production streetable version of the D-Type. Only 16 copies of the XKSS were built of the original production run of 25. Nine were destroyed in the Borwn’s Lane fire of 1957. It didn’t incorporate any of the advances that later appeared on the E-Type. The XKE name was used only on E-Type cars sold in the United States.
>>
>> > On Sep 30, 2021, at 12:27 PM, Ken Waller <kwaller@peoplepc.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Wasn't considering this a debate just a statement of the "facts" as I am aware of.
>> >
>> >
>> > Ken Waller
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> > Sent: Sep 29, 2021 6:42 PM
>> > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> > Subject: Re: GESO British car show
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> On Sep 29, 2021, at 3:09 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Actually the XKE first went on sale in1961, so I'm guessing it's intro was preceded by at least 2 to 3 years for design and development.
>> >
>> > Yeah, the e type was a tamed down xkss from 1957, the Honda Odyssey dates from 1994, but yeah, whether we’re talking 40, 50 or 60 years of development, those were a critical few decades, if only for the roles that computers were able to play starting in the 80’s not only in design but in engine and brake management.
>> >
>> > It would almost seem as if we are 98% in agreement and vigorously debating a superfluous 2% of the question. Fortunately, that doesn’t happen very often.
>--
>%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
>to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
>
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
J
John
Mon, Oct 4, 2021 12:25 AM
WTF?
On 9/30/2021 19:01:53, mike wilson wrote:
On 30 September 2021 at 17:48 Paul Stenquist pnstenquist@comcast.net wrote:
Jaguar positioned the E-Type as the successor to the D-Type race car, not the XKSS, and it featured many upgrades, most notably the independent rear suspension. The most significant shared nature was the subframe/rigid body unit construction. The XKSS was a limited production streetable version of the D-Type. Only 16 copies of the XKSS were built of the original production run of 25. Nine were destroyed in the Borwn’s Lane fire of 1957. It didn’t incorporate any of the advances that later appeared on the E-Type. The XKE name was used only on E-Type cars sold in the United States.
On Sep 30, 2021, at 12:27 PM, Ken Waller kwaller@peoplepc.com wrote:
Wasn't considering this a debate just a statement of the "facts" as I am aware of.
Ken Waller
-----Original Message-----
From: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Sent: Sep 29, 2021 6:42 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: GESO British car show
On Sep 29, 2021, at 3:09 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
Actually the XKE first went on sale in1961, so I'm guessing it's intro was preceded by at least 2 to 3 years for design and development.
Yeah, the e type was a tamed down xkss from 1957, the Honda Odyssey dates from 1994, but yeah, whether we’re talking 40, 50 or 60 years of development, those were a critical few decades, if only for the roles that computers were able to play starting in the 80’s not only in design but in engine and brake management.
It would almost seem as if we are 98% in agreement and vigorously debating a superfluous 2% of the question. Fortunately, that doesn’t happen very often.
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
WTF?
On 9/30/2021 19:01:53, mike wilson wrote:
> It would have been perfect, if only it had a....
>
> https://youtu.be/MXW0bx_Ooq4
>
>> On 30 September 2021 at 17:48 Paul Stenquist <pnstenquist@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Jaguar positioned the E-Type as the successor to the D-Type race car, not the XKSS, and it featured many upgrades, most notably the independent rear suspension. The most significant shared nature was the subframe/rigid body unit construction. The XKSS was a limited production streetable version of the D-Type. Only 16 copies of the XKSS were built of the original production run of 25. Nine were destroyed in the Borwn’s Lane fire of 1957. It didn’t incorporate any of the advances that later appeared on the E-Type. The XKE name was used only on E-Type cars sold in the United States.
>>
>>> On Sep 30, 2021, at 12:27 PM, Ken Waller <kwaller@peoplepc.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Wasn't considering this a debate just a statement of the "facts" as I am aware of.
>>>
>>>
>>> Ken Waller
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> Sent: Sep 29, 2021 6:42 PM
>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> Subject: Re: GESO British car show
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Sep 29, 2021, at 3:09 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Actually the XKE first went on sale in1961, so I'm guessing it's intro was preceded by at least 2 to 3 years for design and development.
>>>
>>> Yeah, the e type was a tamed down xkss from 1957, the Honda Odyssey dates from 1994, but yeah, whether we’re talking 40, 50 or 60 years of development, those were a critical few decades, if only for the roles that computers were able to play starting in the 80’s not only in design but in engine and brake management.
>>>
>>> It would almost seem as if we are 98% in agreement and vigorously debating a superfluous 2% of the question. Fortunately, that doesn’t happen very often.
> --
> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
>
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
LC
Larry Colen
Mon, Oct 4, 2021 12:59 AM
On 9/30/2021 19:01:53, mike wilson wrote:
On 30 September 2021 at 17:48 Paul Stenquist pnstenquist@comcast.net wrote:
Jaguar positioned the E-Type as the successor to the D-Type race car, not the XKSS, and it featured many upgrades, most notably the independent rear suspension. The most significant shared nature was the subframe/rigid body unit construction. The XKSS was a limited production streetable version of the D-Type. Only 16 copies of the XKSS were built of the original production run of 25. Nine were destroyed in the Borwn’s Lane fire of 1957. It didn’t incorporate any of the advances that later appeared on the E-Type. The XKE name was used only on E-Type cars sold in the United States.
On Sep 30, 2021, at 12:27 PM, Ken Waller kwaller@peoplepc.com wrote:
Wasn't considering this a debate just a statement of the "facts" as I am aware of.
Ken Waller
-----Original Message-----
From: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Sent: Sep 29, 2021 6:42 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: GESO British car show
On Sep 29, 2021, at 3:09 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
Actually the XKE first went on sale in1961, so I'm guessing it's intro was preceded by at least 2 to 3 years for design and development.
Yeah, the e type was a tamed down xkss from 1957, the Honda Odyssey dates from 1994, but yeah, whether we’re talking 40, 50 or 60 years of development, those were a critical few decades, if only for the roles that computers were able to play starting in the 80’s not only in design but in engine and brake management.
It would almost seem as if we are 98% in agreement and vigorously debating a superfluous 2% of the question. Fortunately, that doesn’t happen very often.
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
> On Oct 3, 2021, at 5:25 PM, John <jsessoms002@nc.rr.com> wrote:
>
> WTF?
The Interocitor is from “This Island Earth”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCMLmm8oLu4
And Lucas electronics have a someone iffy reputation.
As in the 3-position light switch; off, dim and flicker.
>
> On 9/30/2021 19:01:53, mike wilson wrote:
>> It would have been perfect, if only it had a....
>> https://youtu.be/MXW0bx_Ooq4
>>> On 30 September 2021 at 17:48 Paul Stenquist <pnstenquist@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Jaguar positioned the E-Type as the successor to the D-Type race car, not the XKSS, and it featured many upgrades, most notably the independent rear suspension. The most significant shared nature was the subframe/rigid body unit construction. The XKSS was a limited production streetable version of the D-Type. Only 16 copies of the XKSS were built of the original production run of 25. Nine were destroyed in the Borwn’s Lane fire of 1957. It didn’t incorporate any of the advances that later appeared on the E-Type. The XKE name was used only on E-Type cars sold in the United States.
>>>
>>>> On Sep 30, 2021, at 12:27 PM, Ken Waller <kwaller@peoplepc.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Wasn't considering this a debate just a statement of the "facts" as I am aware of.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ken Waller
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> Sent: Sep 29, 2021 6:42 PM
>>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> Subject: Re: GESO British car show
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 29, 2021, at 3:09 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually the XKE first went on sale in1961, so I'm guessing it's intro was preceded by at least 2 to 3 years for design and development.
>>>> Yeah, the e type was a tamed down xkss from 1957, the Honda Odyssey dates from 1994, but yeah, whether we’re talking 40, 50 or 60 years of development, those were a critical few decades, if only for the roles that computers were able to play starting in the 80’s not only in design but in engine and brake management.
>>>> It would almost seem as if we are 98% in agreement and vigorously debating a superfluous 2% of the question. Fortunately, that doesn’t happen very often.
>> --
>> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
>
>
> --
> Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
> Religion - Answers we must never question.
> --
> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
>
--
Larry Colen
lrc@red4est.com
JF
John Francis
Mon, Oct 4, 2021 5:19 AM
On Sun, Oct 03, 2021 at 05:59:33PM -0700, Larry Colen wrote:
Ah, yes. Joseph Lucas, Prince of Darkness.
Q: Why do the British drink warm beer?
A: Their fridges are made by Lucas.
... and so on ...
On Sun, Oct 03, 2021 at 05:59:33PM -0700, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
> > On Oct 3, 2021, at 5:25 PM, John <jsessoms002@nc.rr.com> wrote:
> >
> > WTF?
>
> The Interocitor is from ???This Island Earth???
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCMLmm8oLu4
>
> And Lucas electronics have a someone iffy reputation.
>
> As in the 3-position light switch; off, dim and flicker.
Ah, yes. Joseph Lucas, Prince of Darkness.
Q: Why do the British drink warm beer?
A: Their fridges are made by Lucas.
... and so on ...
J
John
Mon, Oct 4, 2021 8:00 PM
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
Larry,
I own two MGBs and I have this T-shirt:
http://mossmotorsltd.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Lucus-and-Oscar-001.jpg
On 10/3/2021 20:59:33, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
>> On Oct 3, 2021, at 5:25 PM, John <jsessoms002@nc.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>> WTF?
>
> The Interocitor is from “This Island Earth”
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCMLmm8oLu4
>
> And Lucas electronics have a someone iffy reputation.
>
> As in the 3-position light switch; off, dim and flicker.
>
>
>>
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
LC
Larry Colen
Mon, Oct 4, 2021 8:14 PM
Are they both for driving? Or is one for parts? What years? Roadster or GT?
Getting mine
http://www.red4est.com/jasmine/
back on the road has been an exercise in disaster management, and by disaster I mean wildfires 20 years ago when I was waiting for engine parts, a kid crashing into my garage and putting it out of commission for a year, I admit that racing the miata for a few years sidelined my time/energy budget from Jasmine. After working on the Singer, I’m particularly motivated to let the house fall down on it’s own for a little while so I can get the MG back together. With the supercharger I could keep up with miatas down the straights at the track.
It was through the team.net email lists
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo
that I learned the smoke theory of electronics. That electronics work because of magic smoke, and if you let the magic smoke out, the electronics stop working. And just like British cars leak everything else, they often leak smoke.
On 10/3/2021 20:59:33, Larry Colen wrote:
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
> On Oct 4, 2021, at 1:00 PM, John <jsessoms002@nc.rr.com> wrote:
>
> Larry,
> I own two MGBs and I have this T-shirt:
>
> http://mossmotorsltd.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Lucus-and-Oscar-001.jpg
Are they both for driving? Or is one for parts? What years? Roadster or GT?
Getting mine
http://www.red4est.com/jasmine/
back on the road has been an exercise in disaster management, and by disaster I mean wildfires 20 years ago when I was waiting for engine parts, a kid crashing into my garage and putting it out of commission for a year, I admit that racing the miata for a few years sidelined my time/energy budget from Jasmine. After working on the Singer, I’m particularly motivated to let the house fall down on it’s own for a little while so I can get the MG back together. With the supercharger I could keep up with miatas down the straights at the track.
It was through the team.net email lists
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo
that I learned the smoke theory of electronics. That electronics work because of magic smoke, and if you let the magic smoke out, the electronics stop working. And just like British cars leak everything else, they often leak smoke.
>
> On 10/3/2021 20:59:33, Larry Colen wrote:
>>> On Oct 3, 2021, at 5:25 PM, John <jsessoms002@nc.rr.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> WTF?
>> The Interocitor is from “This Island Earth”
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCMLmm8oLu4
>> And Lucas electronics have a someone iffy reputation.
>> As in the 3-position light switch; off, dim and flicker.
>>>
>
>
>
> --
> Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
> Religion - Answers we must never question.
> --
> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
>
--
Larry Colen
lrc@red4est.com
DJ
Daniel J. Matyola
Mon, Oct 4, 2021 8:20 PM
Are they both for driving? Or is one for parts?
LOL!
I remember my old MG. Always in the shop, and always a long wait for
parts. Once, the throttle linkage broke, and I drove around for months
with baling wire as a "replacement part" until one arrived from British
Lowland. It was a lot of fun to drive -- when I could.
Dan Matyola
*https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery
<https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery>*
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 4:14 PM Larry Colen <lrc@red4est.com> wrote:
>
>
> Are they both for driving? Or is one for parts?
>
>