Thanks! As Rick points out, Ann, with this lens you don't need to add vignetting! :) I assure you: it's not your eyes… You bring up a fair point: I haven't checked, compared the FoV of this 32mm f/2.8 lens against my Voigtänder 28mm or Leica 35mm. I'll do that today … the Lomo has quite a bit more rectilinear distortion than either of those, but exaclty what its FoV is and how well it fits the viewfinder frame it brings up I'm not sure. I tend to frame somewhat loosely with a rangefinder camera and not be so driven to the precise frame lines in the viewfinder. I believe it brings up the frame lines for a 35mm focal length. G > From: Rick Womer <rickpics14@gmail.com> > Date: November 23, 2022 at 6:21:58 AM PST > > Nice set! > > One feature of that lens is that one doesn’t have to add vignetting. > > Rick > From: "Daniel J. Matyola" <danmatyola@gmail.com> > Date: November 23, 2022 at 6:10:33 AM PST > > Well seen and nicely photographed! > > Dan Matyola > From: ann sanfedele <annsan@nyc.rr.com> > Date: November 23, 2022 at 5:52:52 AM PST > > I looked at the full list and picked my faves before seeing your choices.. Condo Castle is one.. > Odd thing about my eyes and the fire Exit... at first glance, before my eyes adjust to the screen glare.. the shrubbery looked like a crouching dog peeking around a corner at the fire exit and it's large size in the frame I attributed to you shooting very wide angle. > > I'm noticing a fair amount of vignetting.. which I hope is your lens and not my eyes. > > ann > On 11/22/2022 5:57 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >> Another fun set of photos from lens testing with the Leica M10 Monochrom ... I saw a review on the Lomography "Lomo LC-A Minitar Art Lens 32mm f/2.8" >> ... >> Here's the gallery of all 19 Minitar test photos… >> Lomo LC-A Minitar Art Lens Test 2022 :: https://flic.kr/s/aHBqjAgkcQ