pdml@pdml.net

Pentax-Discuss Mail List

View all threads

What Pentax gear is on your shopping (or wish) list?

JS
John Sessoms
Tue, Jan 17, 2023 2:46 AM

I'd like to have a backup K-1 body. More than that I'd like more ability
to actually get out and use my cameras. I've been kind of stuck inside
(housebound) here for a while.

On 1/14/2023 11:43 PM, Larry Colen wrote:

It was recently observed that there is almost no discussion of Pentax gear, or even gear for your Pentax, on this list lately.

Let's get this kick started:  What gear is on your shopping list, or at least your wish list? Why do you want it?  Why haven't you bought it yet?

The two major pieces of kit on my "want" list, are the DFA 24-70/2.8, and the K-3 III.

Over the past couple of weeks, I've kind of wanted a weather sealed, "fast", daily driver lens.  I already have a Tamron 28-70/2.8 and the DFA 28-105/3.5-5.6 which is WR.  So I do have weather sealed in that range, and I do have a f/2.8 lens in that range.  I also have the 16-50/2.8 which works just fine on my K-3.  So, I already have the lenses that pretty much surround that specific bit of functionality.

As to the K-3 III, what I really want would be a K-1 III, a K-1 with all of the nifty features they've added to the K-3 III (though I don't really need the fancy pentaprism for the larger field of view, because it's already bigger), plus a modern sensor.  The K-3 was released almost 7 years ago, I mostly use mine these days when I either want a wide angle of view, with a fast lens, or when I need the best sensor performance available to me in challenging light.  I would not be surprised if when you compared the final images, the K-3 III sensor outperformed the K-1.

Since a K-1 III isn't available, or even announced, there are a lot of things the K-3 III does better than my K-1, but I have barely had a chance to take any photos at all the past year, and I haven't really had any chance to photograph in conditions where I'm up against the performance limits of either of my Pentax camera bodies.  I have very little reason not to hold off on buying a K-3 III until either the price drops, or they sell a major upgrade to the K-1.

The 85/1.4 is also kind of on my wish list, but the pricing is such that it barely qualifies as an idle fantasy.

--
Larry Colen
lrc@red4est.com.  sent from Mirkwood

--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

--
Vivere in aeternum aut mori conatur

--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
www.avg.com

I'd like to have a backup K-1 body. More than that I'd like more ability to actually get out and use my cameras. I've been kind of stuck inside (housebound) here for a while. On 1/14/2023 11:43 PM, Larry Colen wrote: > It was recently observed that there is almost no discussion of Pentax gear, or even gear for your Pentax, on this list lately. > > Let's get this kick started: What gear is on your shopping list, or at least your wish list? Why do you want it? Why haven't you bought it yet? > > The two major pieces of kit on my "want" list, are the DFA 24-70/2.8, and the K-3 III. > > Over the past couple of weeks, I've kind of wanted a weather sealed, "fast", daily driver lens. I already have a Tamron 28-70/2.8 and the DFA 28-105/3.5-5.6 which is WR. So I do have weather sealed in that range, and I do have a f/2.8 lens in that range. I also have the 16-50/2.8 which works just fine on my K-3. So, I already have the lenses that pretty much surround that specific bit of functionality. > > As to the K-3 III, what I really want would be a K-1 III, a K-1 with all of the nifty features they've added to the K-3 III (though I don't really need the fancy pentaprism for the larger field of view, because it's already bigger), plus a modern sensor. The K-3 was released almost 7 years ago, I mostly use mine these days when I either want a wide angle of view, with a fast lens, or when I need the best sensor performance available to me in challenging light. I would not be surprised if when you compared the final images, the K-3 III sensor outperformed the K-1. > > Since a K-1 III isn't available, or even announced, there are a lot of things the K-3 III does better than my K-1, but I have barely had a chance to take any photos at all the past year, and I haven't really had any chance to photograph in conditions where I'm up against the performance limits of either of my Pentax camera bodies. I have very little reason not to hold off on buying a K-3 III until either the price drops, or they sell a major upgrade to the K-1. > > The 85/1.4 is also kind of on my wish list, but the pricing is such that it barely qualifies as an idle fantasy. > > > -- > Larry Colen > lrc@red4est.com. sent from Mirkwood > > > -- > %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List > To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Vivere in aeternum aut mori conatur -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software. www.avg.com
C
collinb@brendemuehl.net
Tue, Jan 17, 2023 7:51 PM

For the …

6x7, I’m staying with just one lens. The 67 165mm. Don’t really need another there. Dreaming of a 67 M* 300, but only dreaming.

K-1 II, I have the FA28/1.8, F50/1.7, and F* 300/4.5. Might be nice to have the FA24/2. Really mixed on LTD lenses. The 43/1.0 resolution is nice but the pincushion always bothered me. Is there anything special in the 150mm range?

For the … 6x7, I’m staying with just one lens. The 67 165mm. Don’t really need another there. Dreaming of a 67 M\* 300, but only dreaming. K-1 II, I have the FA28/1.8, F50/1.7, and F\* 300/4.5. Might be nice to have the FA24/2. Really mixed on LTD lenses. The 43/1.0 resolution is nice but the pincushion always bothered me. Is there anything special in the 150mm range?
B
Bill
Tue, Jan 17, 2023 7:59 PM

The 150/3.5 is a sleeper.

Bill

On Tue., Jan. 17, 2023, 1:51 p.m. , collinb@brendemuehl.net wrote:

For the …

6x7, I’m staying with just one lens. The 67 165mm. Don’t really need
another there. Dreaming of a 67 M* 300, but only dreaming.

K-1 II, I have the FA28/1.8, F50/1.7, and F* 300/4.5. Might be nice to
have the FA24/2. Really mixed on LTD lenses. The 43/1.0 resolution is nice
but the pincushion always bothered me. Is there anything special in the
150mm range?

%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.

The 150/3.5 is a sleeper. Bill On Tue., Jan. 17, 2023, 1:51 p.m. , <collinb@brendemuehl.net> wrote: > For the … > > 6x7, I’m staying with just one lens. The 67 165mm. Don’t really need > another there. Dreaming of a 67 M\* 300, but only dreaming. > > K-1 II, I have the FA28/1.8, F50/1.7, and F\* 300/4.5. Might be nice to > have the FA24/2. Really mixed on LTD lenses. The 43/1.0 resolution is nice > but the pincushion always bothered me. Is there anything special in the > 150mm range? > -- > %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List > To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions.
LC
Larry Colen
Tue, Jan 17, 2023 8:25 PM

On Jan 17, 2023, at 11:51 AM, collinb@brendemuehl.net wrote:

For the …

6x7, I’m staying with just one lens. The 67 165mm. Don’t really need another there. Dreaming of a 67 M* 300, but only dreaming.

K-1 II, I have the FA28/1.8, F50/1.7, and F* 300/4.5. Might be nice to have the FA24/2. Really mixed on LTD lenses. The 43/1.0 resolution is nice but the pincushion always bothered me. Is there anything special in the 150mm range?

For the FA 43/1.8 ( I wish it were 1.0) do the lightroom lens profile corrections work well enough for you?
I find I’ll grab mine rather than my FA50/1.4 unless I need that extra bit of speed.

--
Larry Colen
lrc@red4est.com  sent from ret4est

> On Jan 17, 2023, at 11:51 AM, collinb@brendemuehl.net wrote: > > For the … > > 6x7, I’m staying with just one lens. The 67 165mm. Don’t really need another there. Dreaming of a 67 M\* 300, but only dreaming. > > K-1 II, I have the FA28/1.8, F50/1.7, and F\* 300/4.5. Might be nice to have the FA24/2. Really mixed on LTD lenses. The 43/1.0 resolution is nice but the pincushion always bothered me. Is there anything special in the 150mm range? For the FA 43/1.8 ( I wish it were 1.0) do the lightroom lens profile corrections work well enough for you? I find I’ll grab mine rather than my FA50/1.4 unless I need that extra bit of speed. -- Larry Colen lrc@red4est.com sent from ret4est
SC
Steve Cottrell
Wed, Jan 18, 2023 1:18 PM

Sadly, X2.

Pen F and OM-Dii

Cot

On 15 Jan 2023, at 19:41, Brian W brian-w@lyons-ryan.org wrote:

Sadly, Pentax no longer makes the sort of gear that I'm interested in.
Olympus/OM System on the other hand...

Sadly, X2. Pen F and OM-Dii Cot On 15 Jan 2023, at 19:41, Brian W <brian-w@lyons-ryan.org> wrote: Sadly, Pentax no longer makes the sort of gear that I'm interested in. Olympus/OM System on the other hand...
C
collinb@brendemuehl.net
Wed, Jan 18, 2023 1:36 PM

Larry Colen wrote:

For the FA 43/1.8 ( I wish it were 1.0) do the lightroom lens profile corrections work well enough for you?
I find I’ll grab mine rather than my FA50/1.4 unless I need that extra bit of speed.

--
Larry Colen
lrc@red4est.com  sent from ret4est

I do bare minimum PS Elements work. Being just a bit old-fashioned, I depend on the optical design first.

Perhaps I should invest in decent PS/LR.

Collin

Larry Colen wrote: > > For the FA 43/1.8 ( I wish it were 1.0) do the lightroom lens profile corrections work well enough for you? > > I find I’ll grab mine rather than my FA50/1.4 unless I need that extra bit of speed. > > \-- > Larry Colen > lrc@red4est.com sent from ret4est I do bare minimum PS Elements work. Being just a bit old-fashioned, I depend on the optical design first. Perhaps I should invest in decent PS/LR. Collin
B
Bill
Wed, Jan 18, 2023 2:39 PM

On 1/18/2023 7:36 AM, collinb@brendemuehl.net wrote:

Larry Colen wrote:

For the FA 43/1.8 ( I wish it were 1.0) do the lightroom lens profile corrections work well enough for you?
I find I’ll grab mine rather than my FA50/1.4 unless I need that extra bit of speed.

--
Larry Colen
lrc@red4est.com  sent from ret4est

I do bare minimum PS Elements work. Being just a bit old-fashioned, I depend on the optical design first.

Perhaps I should invest in decent PS/LR.

If your happy with Elements, stay with Elements. The full LR/PS suite is
very powerful software and opens up some very nice features, but you
will be on a rent to never own scenario to get it.
I've got no problem with it, though a lot of people don't like that
business model.

bill

On 1/18/2023 7:36 AM, collinb@brendemuehl.net wrote: > Larry Colen wrote: > >>> For the FA 43/1.8 ( I wish it were 1.0) do the lightroom lens profile corrections work well enough for you? >>> I find I’ll grab mine rather than my FA50/1.4 unless I need that extra bit of speed. >> \-- >> Larry Colen >> lrc@red4est.com sent from ret4est > I do bare minimum PS Elements work. Being just a bit old-fashioned, I depend on the optical design first. > > Perhaps I should invest in decent PS/LR. If your happy with Elements, stay with Elements. The full LR/PS suite is very powerful software and opens up some very nice features, but you will be on a rent to never own scenario to get it. I've got no problem with it, though a lot of people don't like that business model. bill
JS
John Sessoms
Wed, Jan 18, 2023 5:57 PM

OTOH, if you already had a perpetual license version of either one of
them, those still work. I've got CS6 Extended on my computer & that's
what I use.

On 1/18/2023 9:39 AM, Bill wrote:

On 1/18/2023 7:36 AM, collinb@brendemuehl.net wrote:

Larry Colen wrote:

For the FA 43/1.8 ( I wish it were 1.0) do the lightroom lens
profile corrections work well enough for you?
I find I’ll grab mine rather than my FA50/1.4 unless I need that
extra bit of speed.

--
Larry Colen
lrc@red4est.com  sent from ret4est

I do bare minimum PS Elements work. Being just a bit old-fashioned, I
depend on the optical design first.

Perhaps I should invest in decent PS/LR.

If your happy with Elements, stay with Elements. The full LR/PS suite is
very powerful software and opens up some very nice features, but you
will be on a rent to never own scenario to get it.
I've got no problem with it, though a lot of people don't like that
business model.

bill

--
Vivere in aeternum aut mori conatur

--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
www.avg.com

OTOH, if you already had a perpetual license version of either one of them, those still work. I've got CS6 Extended on my computer & that's what I use. On 1/18/2023 9:39 AM, Bill wrote: > On 1/18/2023 7:36 AM, collinb@brendemuehl.net wrote: >> Larry Colen wrote: >> >>>> For the FA 43/1.8 ( I wish it were 1.0) do the lightroom lens >>>> profile corrections work well enough for you? >>>> I find I’ll grab mine rather than my FA50/1.4 unless I need that >>>> extra bit of speed. >>> \-- >>> Larry Colen >>> lrc@red4est.com  sent from ret4est >> I do bare minimum PS Elements work. Being just a bit old-fashioned, I >> depend on the optical design first. >> >> Perhaps I should invest in decent PS/LR. > If your happy with Elements, stay with Elements. The full LR/PS suite is > very powerful software and opens up some very nice features, but you > will be on a rent to never own scenario to get it. > I've got no problem with it, though a lot of people don't like that > business model. > > bill > -- -- Vivere in aeternum aut mori conatur -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software. www.avg.com