pdml@pdml.net

Pentax-Discuss Mail List

View all threads

Curious ...

C
collinb@brendemuehl.net
Wed, Jun 28, 2023 1:29 PM

Anyone here EVER use the double-exposure capacity of the LX?

I always thought it was cool, but never needed it so never got one.

(The only other PK body I’ve seen with double-exposure is that Promaster 2500 PK)

Anyone here EVER use the double-exposure capacity of the LX? I always thought it was cool, but never needed it so never got one. (The only other PK body I’ve seen with double-exposure is that Promaster 2500 PK)
JS
John Sessoms
Wed, Jun 28, 2023 7:52 PM

I've used it. It worked in so far as the frames lined up properly.

On 6/28/2023 9:29 AM, collinb@brendemuehl.net wrote:

Anyone here EVER use the double-exposure capacity of the LX?

I always thought it was cool, but never needed it so never got one.

(The only other PK body I’ve seen with double-exposure is that Promaster 2500 PK)

%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

--
Vivere in aeternum aut mori conatur

--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
www.avg.com

I've used it. It worked in so far as the frames lined up properly. On 6/28/2023 9:29 AM, collinb@brendemuehl.net wrote: > Anyone here EVER use the double-exposure capacity of the LX? > > I always thought it was cool, but never needed it so never got one. > > (The only other PK body I’ve seen with double-exposure is that Promaster 2500 PK) > -- > %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List > To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Vivere in aeternum aut mori conatur -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software. www.avg.com
DM
David Mann
Thu, Jun 29, 2023 5:02 AM

Pretty sure the K2 could do it too.  I remember using it once.

Cheers,
Dave

On Jun 29, 2023, at 1:29 AM, collinb@brendemuehl.net wrote:

Anyone here EVER use the double-exposure capacity of the LX?

I always thought it was cool, but never needed it so never got one.

(The only other PK body I’ve seen with double-exposure is that Promaster 2500 PK)

%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Pretty sure the K2 could do it too. I remember using it once. Cheers, Dave > On Jun 29, 2023, at 1:29 AM, collinb@brendemuehl.net wrote: > > Anyone here EVER use the double-exposure capacity of the LX? > > I always thought it was cool, but never needed it so never got one. > > (The only other PK body I’ve seen with double-exposure is that Promaster 2500 PK) > -- > %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List > To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
AS
ann sanfedele
Thu, Jun 29, 2023 12:13 PM

I vaguely remember trying it a couple of times back in the 80's -I
mostly did double exposures in the darkroom.
ann

On 6/28/2023 3:52 PM, John Sessoms wrote:

I've used it. It worked in so far as the frames lined up properly.

On 6/28/2023 9:29 AM, collinb@brendemuehl.net wrote:

Anyone here EVER use the double-exposure capacity of the LX?

I always thought it was cool, but never needed it so never got one.

(The only other PK body I’ve seen with double-exposure is that
Promaster 2500 PK)

%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and follow the directions.

I vaguely remember trying it a couple of times back in the 80's -I mostly did double exposures in the darkroom. ann On 6/28/2023 3:52 PM, John Sessoms wrote: > I've used it. It worked in so far as the frames lined up properly. > > On 6/28/2023 9:29 AM, collinb@brendemuehl.net wrote: >> Anyone here EVER use the double-exposure capacity of the LX? >> >> I always thought it was cool, but never needed it so never got one. >> >> (The only other PK body I’ve seen with double-exposure is that >> Promaster 2500 PK) >> -- >> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above >> and follow the directions. > -- ann sanfedele photography https://annsan.smugmug.com https://www.cafepress.com/+ann-sanfedele+gifts https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/annsan https://www.createphotocalendars.com/Shop/annsanfedelecalendarsandbooks
C
collinb@brendemuehl.net
Thu, Jun 29, 2023 1:51 PM

The K2 method is no different than any other camera with a rewind button on the bottom.

The LX was clearly special.

The K2 method is no different than any other camera with a rewind button on the bottom. The LX was clearly special.
JS
John Sessoms
Tue, May 14, 2024 2:09 PM

Very late reply:

I have, but the results were not very good.

NOT a fault with the camera, but with the brain behind the eye behind
the viewfinder.

On 6/28/2023 9:29 AM, collinb@brendemuehl.net wrote:

Anyone here EVER use the double-exposure capacity of the LX?

I always thought it was cool, but never needed it so never got one.

(The only other PK body I’ve seen with double-exposure is that Promaster 2500 PK)

--
Vivere in aeternum aut mori conatur

--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
www.avg.com

Very late reply: I have, but the results were not very good. NOT a fault with the camera, but with the brain behind the eye behind the viewfinder. On 6/28/2023 9:29 AM, collinb@brendemuehl.net wrote: > Anyone here EVER use the double-exposure capacity of the LX? > > I always thought it was cool, but never needed it so never got one. > > (The only other PK body I’ve seen with double-exposure is that Promaster 2500 PK) > -- -- Vivere in aeternum aut mori conatur -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software. www.avg.com