BW
Bob W PDML
Mon, Jun 17, 2024 8:42 PM
£499 in the UK.
https://analoguewonderland.co.uk/products/pentax-17-35mm-film-camera?utm_source=Klaviyo&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=P17%20Launch%20%2801J0JYBP11MHH3ZATZKFNC4YCG%29&tw_source=klaviyo&_kx=b_LcnNXhQCJBhLdWaXpSIJttvJ07EUU9zBZusFUDQQs.PM5vmq
SC
Steve Cottrell
Mon, Jun 17, 2024 9:20 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICIDcOtlSrQ
> On 17 Jun 2024, at 21:42, Bob W PDML <pdmlbw@icloud.com> wrote:
>
> £499 in the UK.
>
> https://analoguewonderland.co.uk/products/pentax-17-35mm-film-camera?utm_source=Klaviyo&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=P17%20Launch%20%2801J0JYBP11MHH3ZATZKFNC4YCG%29&tw_source=klaviyo&_kx=b_LcnNXhQCJBhLdWaXpSIJttvJ07EUU9zBZusFUDQQs.PM5vmq <https://analoguewonderland.co.uk/products/pentax-17-35mm-film-camera?utm_source=Klaviyo&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=P17%20Launch%20%2801J0JYBP11MHH3ZATZKFNC4YCG%29&tw_source=klaviyo&_kx=b_LcnNXhQCJBhLdWaXpSIJttvJ07EUU9zBZusFUDQQs.PM5vmq>
> --
HT
Henk Terhell
Mon, Jun 17, 2024 9:57 PM
€ 550 in NL. For somewhat lower cost I'd rather have a Pentax WG-8.
Henk
Op 2024-06-17 om 22:42 schreef Bob W PDML:
£499 in the UK.
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
€ 550 in NL. For somewhat lower cost I'd rather have a Pentax WG-8.
Henk
Op 2024-06-17 om 22:42 schreef Bob W PDML:
> £499 in the UK.
>
> https://analoguewonderland.co.uk/products/pentax-17-35mm-film-camera?utm_source=Klaviyo&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=P17%20Launch%20%2801J0JYBP11MHH3ZATZKFNC4YCG%29&tw_source=klaviyo&_kx=b_LcnNXhQCJBhLdWaXpSIJttvJ07EUU9zBZusFUDQQs.PM5vmq
> --
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
SH
Stan Halpin
Mon, Jun 17, 2024 10:30 PM
$499 in US. I must say I am very tempted to have one of these in my pocket on my upcoming trip…
Stan
Sent from my iPad
On Jun 17, 2024, at 4:42 PM, Bob W PDML pdmlbw@icloud.com wrote:
£499 in the UK.
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
$499 in US. I must say I am very tempted to have one of these in my pocket on my upcoming trip…
Stan
Sent from my iPad
> On Jun 17, 2024, at 4:42 PM, Bob W PDML <pdmlbw@icloud.com> wrote:
>
> £499 in the UK.
>
> https://analoguewonderland.co.uk/products/pentax-17-35mm-film-camera?utm_source=Klaviyo&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=P17%20Launch%20%2801J0JYBP11MHH3ZATZKFNC4YCG%29&tw_source=klaviyo&_kx=b_LcnNXhQCJBhLdWaXpSIJttvJ07EUU9zBZusFUDQQs.PM5vmq
> --
> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
B
Bill
Mon, Jun 17, 2024 10:57 PM
It looks a lot more complete than I was expecting. A little more
expensive as well, but then, it is a Pentax.
bill
Ignore the offlist message Bob, I pressed the wrong button.
On 6/17/2024 2:42 PM, Bob W PDML wrote:
£499 in the UK.
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
It looks a lot more complete than I was expecting. A little more
expensive as well, but then, it is a Pentax.
bill
Ignore the offlist message Bob, I pressed the wrong button.
On 6/17/2024 2:42 PM, Bob W PDML wrote:
> £499 in the UK.
>
> https://analoguewonderland.co.uk/products/pentax-17-35mm-film-camera?utm_source=Klaviyo&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=P17%20Launch%20%2801J0JYBP11MHH3ZATZKFNC4YCG%29&tw_source=klaviyo&_kx=b_LcnNXhQCJBhLdWaXpSIJttvJ07EUU9zBZusFUDQQs.PM5vmq
> --
> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
LC
Larry Colen
Mon, Jun 17, 2024 11:03 PM
A lot more usable than I was expecting.
A little more expensive as well, but then, it is a Pentax.0.
About the same as 120 gallons of gas, in early 1973 that would have been about $40, in 1974 that would have been about $60.
bill
Ignore the offlist message Bob, I pressed the wrong button.
On 6/17/2024 2:42 PM, Bob W PDML wrote:
£499 in the UK.
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
> On Jun 17, 2024, at 3:57 PM, Bill <anotherdrunkensot@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It looks a lot more complete than I was expecting.
A lot more usable than I was expecting.
> A little more expensive as well, but then, it is a Pentax.0.
About the same as 120 gallons of gas, in early 1973 that would have been about $40, in 1974 that would have been about $60.
>
> bill
>
> Ignore the offlist message Bob, I pressed the wrong button.
>
> On 6/17/2024 2:42 PM, Bob W PDML wrote:
>> £499 in the UK.
>>
>> https://analoguewonderland.co.uk/products/pentax-17-35mm-film-camera?utm_source=Klaviyo&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=P17%20Launch%20%2801J0JYBP11MHH3ZATZKFNC4YCG%29&tw_source=klaviyo&_kx=b_LcnNXhQCJBhLdWaXpSIJttvJ07EUU9zBZusFUDQQs.PM5vmq
>> --
>> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
> --
> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-leave@pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
>
--
Larry Colen
lrc@red4est.com sent from ret13est
MR
Mark Roberts
Mon, Jun 17, 2024 11:11 PM
Interesting. Not my cup of tea, but I'm so far outside the intended
demographic I might as well be in orbit. At first I thought the
portrait mode framing was odd, but then I remembered this camera is
being targeted at an audience who regards that as default because
they've grown up on smartphone cameras.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
Bob W PDML wrote:
>£499 in the UK.
>
>https://analoguewonderland.co.uk/products/pentax-17-35mm-film-camera?utm_source=Klaviyo&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=P17%20Launch%20%2801J0JYBP11MHH3ZATZKFNC4YCG%29&tw_source=klaviyo&_kx=b_LcnNXhQCJBhLdWaXpSIJttvJ07EUU9zBZusFUDQQs.PM5vmq
Interesting. Not my cup of tea, but I'm so far outside the intended
demographic I might as well be in orbit. At first I thought the
portrait mode framing was odd, but then I remembered this camera is
being targeted at an audience who regards that as default because
they've grown up on smartphone cameras.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
JF
John Francis
Tue, Jun 18, 2024 4:05 AM
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 04:03:50PM -0700, Larry Colen wrote:
A lot more usable than I was expecting.
A little more expensive as well, but then, it is a Pentax.0.
About the same as 120 gallons of gas, in early 1973 that would have been about $40, in 1974 that would have been about $60.
I can't remember exactly how much I paiid for my first Pentax (SP II + 50mm/f1.4) in 1972,
but I'm pretty sure I paid significantly more than that.
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 04:03:50PM -0700, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
> > On Jun 17, 2024, at 3:57 PM, Bill <anotherdrunkensot@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > It looks a lot more complete than I was expecting.
>
> A lot more usable than I was expecting.
>
> > A little more expensive as well, but then, it is a Pentax.0.
>
> About the same as 120 gallons of gas, in early 1973 that would have been about $40, in 1974 that would have been about $60.
I can't remember exactly how much I paiid for my first Pentax (SP II + 50mm/f1.4) in 1972,
but I'm pretty sure I paid significantly more than that.
MW
mike wilson
Tue, Jun 18, 2024 6:47 AM
On 18/06/2024 05:05 BST John Francis johnf@panix.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 04:03:50PM -0700, Larry Colen wrote:
A lot more usable than I was expecting.
A little more expensive as well, but then, it is a Pentax.0.
About the same as 120 gallons of gas, in early 1973 that would have been about $40, in 1974 that would have been about $60.
I can't remember exactly how much I paiid for my first Pentax (SP II + 50mm/f1.4) in 1972,
but I'm pretty sure I paid significantly more than that.
The place in the UK offering the new beastie also offers (when in stock) the K1000 for over £100 less. Although that in itself is daylight robbery, I know which I would choose.
> On 18/06/2024 05:05 BST John Francis <johnf@panix.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 04:03:50PM -0700, Larry Colen wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On Jun 17, 2024, at 3:57 PM, Bill <anotherdrunkensot@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > It looks a lot more complete than I was expecting.
> >
> > A lot more usable than I was expecting.
> >
> > > A little more expensive as well, but then, it is a Pentax.0.
> >
> > About the same as 120 gallons of gas, in early 1973 that would have been about $40, in 1974 that would have been about $60.
>
> I can't remember exactly how much I paiid for my first Pentax (SP II + 50mm/f1.4) in 1972,
> but I'm pretty sure I paid significantly more than that.
The place in the UK offering the new beastie also offers (when in stock) the K1000 for over £100 less. Although that in itself is daylight robbery, I know which I would choose.
B
Bill
Tue, Jun 18, 2024 1:03 PM
On 6/18/2024 12:47 AM, mike wilson wrote:
On 18/06/2024 05:05 BST John Francis johnf@panix.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 04:03:50PM -0700, Larry Colen wrote:
A lot more usable than I was expecting.
A little more expensive as well, but then, it is a Pentax.0.
About the same as 120 gallons of gas, in early 1973 that would have been about $40, in 1974 that would have been about $60.
I can't remember exactly how much I paiid for my first Pentax (SP II + 50mm/f1.4) in 1972,
but I'm pretty sure I paid significantly more than that.
The place in the UK offering the new beastie also offers (when in stock) the K1000 for over £100 less. Although that in itself is daylight robbery, I know which I would choose.
The problem with the camera from the POV of the PDML isn't the camera,
it's that we are all too fucking old. The target market isn't a bunch of
people in God's waiting room.
bill
On 6/18/2024 12:47 AM, mike wilson wrote:
>> On 18/06/2024 05:05 BST John Francis <johnf@panix.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 04:03:50PM -0700, Larry Colen wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Jun 17, 2024, at 3:57 PM, Bill <anotherdrunkensot@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It looks a lot more complete than I was expecting.
>>> A lot more usable than I was expecting.
>>>
>>>> A little more expensive as well, but then, it is a Pentax.0.
>>> About the same as 120 gallons of gas, in early 1973 that would have been about $40, in 1974 that would have been about $60.
>> I can't remember exactly how much I paiid for my first Pentax (SP II + 50mm/f1.4) in 1972,
>> but I'm pretty sure I paid significantly more than that.
> The place in the UK offering the new beastie also offers (when in stock) the K1000 for over £100 less. Although that in itself is daylight robbery, I know which I would choose.
The problem with the camera from the POV of the PDML isn't the camera,
it's that we are all too fucking old. The target market isn't a bunch of
people in God's waiting room.
bill
