Pentax Photo Gallery
Daniel J. Matyola
danmatyola at gmail.com
Fri Oct 18 17:03:20 EDT 2019
But have we seen the end of the PDML Annual?
The PPG is certainly not perfect, but it is the best we have at this point.
I agree about your comment on the PPG favoring images with "pop" and
"sizzle." I submitted one of my favorite images, a study of the texture of
tree bark. It was rejected. I submitted it again, and it was rejected
again. I submitted it a third time, in a different category, and it was
approved -- and placed in the Premiere Gallery. It was a matter of getting
the right people to look at it.
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 4:52 PM Larry Colen <lrc at red4est.com> wrote:
> Daniel J. Matyola wrote on 10/17/19 12:10 PM:
> > I am just curious as to who else is submitting and voting on images in
> > PPG, now that it is reactivated, and what kind of experiences you are
> > having there.
> Many years back I submitted a few photos to the PPG, and quickly
> realized that the photos that got voted in were not the ones I
> considered my best work but rather the ones that had the most "pop" and
> My other experience with "juried" work has been the PDML annual. If the
> PPG were judged by those standards I think that the photos would be
> chosen for a more "educated palette" and more interesting to me. I
> think that I've just been spoiled by what I see on PDML.
> Larry Colen LRC at red4est.com http://red4est.com/lrc
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML at pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
More information about the PDML