Pentax lenses I want

P. J. Alling webstertwentysix at gmail.com
Sat Nov 2 23:01:39 EDT 2019


Actually the lens I want, but can't justify, is the DA 16-50mm f2.8.

I already have a Sigma 17-70 f2.8~4.5 which covers the range, and suits 
my needs most of the time.

Plus the Tamron 17-50mm is a wee bit better optically by all accounts 
and much closer to my budget.

I wouldn't turn my nose up at the Pentax if I could get it for the same 
price as the Tamron, since it probably beats it like a rag doll as far 
as build quality is concerned.

On 11/1/2019 2:12 PM, Juan Buhler wrote:
> I figured I'd start a thread about lens lust. Note this is not "lenses I
> need". I have too many as it is, covering every focal length I care about
> (which doesn't go much further than 100 or 135mm anyway)
>
> DA15/4: I have the DA21mm, and it's an awesome lens. Seems like the 15
> would be a great companion to it. I don't really need it, since I have some
> zooms that cover this focal length, plus I haven't been shooting with the
> KP much anyway.
>
> M20/4: I don't know why I want this one, I just do. I really like the M
> lenses. I do have the DA21 Limited for APS, and the Sigma 20/2.8 for APS on
> the Sony, and an awesome Zeiss 21/2.8 for full frame on Leicas and Sonys.
> And that's without counting the zooms that cover that both on APS and full
> frame: I have a 17-70/4, a 12-24/4, and a Canon 17-40/4 that covers full
> frame with fast AF via an adaptor on the Sony.
>
> M40/2.8: I just always wanted that little pancake lens. Don't need it, as I
> have tons of both 35mm and 50mm lenses, plus a really nice Konica Hexanon
> 40mm/1.8 that is perfect for the A7ii.
>
> DA20-40: This seems like the perfect street lens for the KP. Been wanting
> it since it came out, but never pulled the trigger. Again, I already have
> other lenses covering this range.
>
> K85/1.8: I had this lens. It fell from my motorcycle jacket the day I was
> getting my istD back in 2004. I never saw it again. It's not a FL I
> regularly use so it's hard to justify. I had found it in pristine condition
> for under $100 back in the late 90s.
>
> M28/3.5: This was my main 28, my copy seemed to be a lot sharper than what
> should be legal. I lost it years ago. I do have an M28/2.8 and the
> FA28/2.8, plus a Takumar 28/3.5 (the big barreled one). Oh and I do have
> the awesome K30/2.8 and a bunch of other 28s for other mounts, so it's
> super hard to justify buying this one.
>
> Takumar 50/1.4, 8 element: I REALLY don't need this. My best 50mms are a
> Summicron, the A50/1.4, maybe the M50/1.7 or FA50/1.7 (yes, I have all
> those plus a lot more 50s!)
>
> K50/1.2: Again, I don't need another 50. But it sure would be nice to play
> with that extra third of a stop.
>
> How about you? Any lenses you've always wanted but haven't gotten around to
> getting? Any opinions on that list above?
>
> j
>
> --
> Juan Buhler - http://www.jbuhler.com

-- 
America wasn't founded so that we could all be better.
America was founded so we could all be anything we damn well please.
     - P.J. O'Rourke




More information about the PDML mailing list