OT: Out of the World image
jsessoms002 at nc.rr.com
Sat Apr 13 12:01:31 EDT 2019
I think technically, it's a "photographic representation" of all the bits of
data from a ton of hard-drives (I think they mean that literally - 2000+ pounds
of hard-drives) combined to produce the image.
If you want to be an ass-hat about it, it's not "really" a photograph until
you've exposed light sensitive paper to the image and developed it by subjecting
it to a chemical solution.
The "purists" can kiss my ...
On 4/12/2019 11:19:16, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
> Last night, during late-night drive, while there was nothing listenable on the
> usual radio stations, I turned on "Coast-to-Coast" on the radio (Late night AM
> radio talk program about "paranormal" things).
> There was some "expert" who was talking about this blackhole image: "This is not
> exactly a photograph... It is an image that is made [up] based on the data, ..."
> (Which is true in the very strict meaning of the word "photograph", if you
> consider the origin of the word photography, - from Greek "photos" meaning
> "light". Wavelengths used for the image are far from the visible light spectrum.)
> That reminded me of some similar statements by "purists" among photographers
> about what constitutes an unaltered [digital] photograph, i.e. how processing an
> image makes it not a "true photo".
> Mark Roberts Thu, 11 Apr 2019 08:39:51 -0700 wrote:
> John wrote:
>> One of my rocket scientist friends says the image is "fuzzy", which is
>> supposed to be some kind of physics joke. It just looks slightly out of
>> focus to me. 8^)
>> The best bit is the narration accompanying the *simple explanation video*...
>> "... black holes are extremely hard to see."
>> Ya' think? It's black and it's 55 million light-years from Earth!
> Also: It's HUGE! https://xkcd.com/2135/
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
More information about the PDML