OT: Worst Jobs for the future

John sessomsj at earthlink.net
Sun Mar 25 14:36:31 EDT 2018

Since it was Kiplinger, I automatically equated "bad" with "no future income 

There's still a whole universe of "bad = hard, demanding, uncomfortable 
low-paying" jobs out there. Those jobs will still be around in the future.

On 3/25/2018 13:15, P. J. Alling wrote:
> They equate jobs with limited future with bad jobs.  A bad job is one you don't 
> want, the jobs they describe are jobs you might want but are not available.  
> There's a big difference.  I gave up after reading three.  A job I would 
> consider much worse than any of those is recyclable sorter.  A job that seems to 
> be truly awful in every way.
> On 3/23/2018 9:14 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>> Check out number 2:
>> https://www.kiplinger.com/slideshow/business/T012-S001-worst-jobs-for-the-future-2017/index.html?cid=32_0010207ecdf4c62cfba32bfaf33a3ec5a4 
>> Dan Matyola
>> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola

Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

More information about the PDML mailing list