MX shutter problem?

P. J. Alling webstertwentysix at gmail.com
Sun Jul 25 15:09:13 EDT 2010


It's terrible, photographers actually insisted on using their MX's.

On 7/25/2010 2:55 PM, Toralf Lund wrote:
> J.C. O'Connell wrote:
>> cheaper to just buy another one that still works.
> That was sort of what I was thinking.
>
> On the other hand, if I spend the money on a CLA, perhaps it is less 
> likely that I have a problem again after a little while. But like I 
> said, the camera does look a bit worn down, so perhaps not...
>
> . T
>> -- 
>> J.C. O'Connell (mailto:hifisapi at gate.net)
>> Join the CD PLAYER & DISC Discussions :
>> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdplayers/
>> http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdsound/
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: pdml-bounces at pdml.net [mailto:pdml-bounces at pdml.net] On Behalf 
>> Of P.
>> J. Alling
>> Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 2:38 PM
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Subject: Re: MX shutter problem?
>>
>>
>> A CLA might clear up the problems.
>>
>>
>>
>
>


-- 
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Courier New;}}
\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 I've just upgraded to Thunderbird 3.0 and the interface subtly weird.\par
}





More information about the PDML mailing list