PUG??

paul stenquist pnstenquist at comcast.net
Thu Jul 22 20:21:29 EDT 2010


On Jul 22, 2010, at 7:20 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:

> On 23/07/2010, Brian Walters <supera1000 at fastmail.fm> wrote:
> 
>> I think the problem is that people are posting so many PESOs these days
>> that the PUG might be seen as being less necessary than in the past.
>> 
>> That's a pity because the PUG is a permanent gallery and it's good fun
>> to wander though past galleries - all the way back to March 1998 - to
>> see how people tackled the different themes.  And then there's that "I
>> remember him/her" or "Who the hell was....."  nostalgia  :-)>
> 
> The main problem for me is that the PUG is stuck in a bit of a time
> warp, the maximum size for image submissions means that certain image
> attributes (and often a lot of the interest) tend to get lost in the
> downsizing.
> 
I agree. Scot upsized it a bit, but the pics are still on the itty bitty side.  
Paul

> -- 
> Rob Studdert (Digital  Image Studio)
> Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
> Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML at pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.





More information about the PDML mailing list