PopPhoto Review of the K7
eckinator at gmail.com
Wed Oct 21 18:16:04 EDT 2009
they do have a point. what they overlook though is that not everyone
needs every feature theoretically available for inclusion in the
perfect camera... there was no af or advanced metering when I started
out and some of the shots I took back then are definitely keepers
still by my today's standards
2009/10/21 David J Brooks <pentkon52 at gmail.com>:
> Sounds like the standard Pentax review, we like it, but.........
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Larry Levy <larrylevy at sprintmail.com> wrote:
>> Here's the URL for the PopPhoto review of the K7:
>> Please note the date the site claims Philip Ryan posted the review -
>> November 15, 2008. I guess someones been playing with the way-back machine
>> The conclusion:
>> "Ultimately, the Pentax K-7 lands in an odd place in the DSLR world. Its got
>> some high-end features, particularly its tough build and terrific
>> viewfinder. But, its sluggish AF in low light and otherwise middling test
>> results don't scream "Buy me!" If you've got Pentax lenses already, the K-7
>> is a highly competent camera that will let you build on what you have. But,
>> if you're an experienced photographer who's starting a DSLR outfit from
>> scratch, you can get more bang for your buck elsewhere."
>> Gosh, I miss Bert K.
>> Larry in Dallas
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML at pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>> follow the directions.
> Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
> York Region, Ontario, Canada
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML at pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
More information about the PDML