Little piece on lenses

John Francis johnf at panix.com
Sun Oct 18 00:34:08 EDT 2009


On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 07:19:45PM -0700, Tim Bray wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 3:10 PM, paul stenquist <pnstenquist at comcast.net> wrote:
> >  With the 12-24, 16-50,
> > 50-135, and 60-250, I'm prepared for almost anything.
> 
> Especially physiotherapy. I know some good chiropractors too if you
> need a referral.  Primes are back-friendly, and none of us are getting
> younger. -T

Hah.  Try walking around the track for an afternoon lugging a couple of
bodies with (battery grip), an 80-200/2.8, a 300/2.8, and the 250-600.
Just the 250-600 probably weighs more than all the lenses Paul lists.





More information about the PDML mailing list