Raynox 250 on AF160FC on F100macro

P. J. Alling webstertwentysix at gmail.com
Sat Oct 10 12:06:41 EDT 2009

I probably would never have taken these photographs, but I still hate you.

Toine wrote:
> I noticed the AF160FC ringflash has a filter thread inside the ring
> which sparked an idea. Searched in my garbage drawers and found some
> step down rings to attach the Raynox 250:
> http://www.repiuk.nl/images/raynox-ringflash.jpg
> Mounted the contraption on the F100 macro and searched for the
> smallest bugs in my backyard:
> http://www.repiuk.nl/images/ssp/permalink.html#id=album-126&num=content-3726
> http://www.repiuk.nl/images/ssp/permalink.html#id=album-126&num=content-3725
> The body of this fly or whatever is about 1-2 mm. Measured the fly in
> photoshop with and without the raynox and it's an extra 1.6x. Does
> this setup qualify as a microscope?
> Toine
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML at pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.


The free man owns himself. He can damage himself with either eating or drinking; he can ruin himself with gambling. If he does he is certainly a damn fool, and he might possibly be a damned soul; but if he may not, he is not a free man any more than a dog.

	--G. K. Chesterton

More information about the PDML mailing list