The BS of Digital Photography

Joseph McAllister pentaxian at
Thu Oct 8 23:48:50 EDT 2009

On Oct 8, 2009, at 16:14 , Ken Waller wrote:

Hope you all don't mind if I re-insert the 3 responses that W. Robb  
and I wrote yesterday (Wednesday) that somehow were summarily  
overlooked.   :-)

> ----- Original Message ----- From: "William Robb" <warobb at>
> Subject: Re: The BS of Digital Photography
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Waller"
>> Subject: Re: The BS of Digital Photography

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I quickly came to the realization that if I  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get it right in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the camera, I can save myself boatloads of  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> post processing time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why is everyone so damned busy processing posts?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm on the fence about that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't worry, I'll picket up from here.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't you guys ever get board with the pun threads?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think you nailed it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good. For a while there, I thought we were screwed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Time to go out and get hammered, post haste.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why wood we?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They're just knot very funny.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So the anti-punsters will just have to grain and bear it.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I think they should be pulped!
>>>>>>>>>>> now you're being fictitious!
>>>>>>>>>> no, just quentintious...
>>>>>>>>> there there, here's a quentin solace...
>>>>>>>> I guess I have my master in quentin physics for a reason ]=)
>>>>>>> Thats travolting
>>>>>> But isn't that going against the grain ?
>>>>> Now you're making me cross - cut it out!
>>>> That's right, rip into him for having a little fun.
>>> Great, so now I'm gonna get drilled for my comment
>> Be careful of your posts next time.
> Just don't fence me in.

Joseph McAllister

More information about the PDML mailing list