New macro lens
cakaltm at gmail.com
Thu Oct 8 22:11:42 EDT 2009
Yes it is a fabulous lens, ugly as lenses go and heavy, but a great performer.
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Graydon <oak at uniserve.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 03:55:38PM -0500, Tom C scripsit:
>> This won't help but I was surprised that the used normal FA 100/2.8
>> Macros have a higher asking price than the brand new D-FA's on e-bay.
> It's sharper. The DFA has better colour rendering, but the FA is
> It's also built like an aluminium brick.
>> FWIW, I find the lens perfectly acceptable on the digital bodies. I
>> think I paid $200 for it, from the used lens counter of a camera shop
>> in 1999.
> I paid 900 CAD for mine; last new one Henry's had in the fall of 2007.
> (Yes, this was before I had a camera to put it on. I was dithering
> between the K10 and expected-in-September K20D.) Don't regret it.
> -- Graydon
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML at pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
More information about the PDML