DPR review of K-7

paul stenquist pnstenquist at comcast.net
Sat Oct 3 23:29:56 EDT 2009


On Oct 3, 2009, at 11:23 PM, Jack Davis wrote:

> Although I don't know what your specific exposure issue is, I have  
> never shot in other than RAW, so am fine with a bit of under  
> exposure. Much prefer to apply a slight +exposure nudge than deal  
> with dreaded blown highlights.
>
> Jack

I shoot only RAW as well, but I don't like even a small amount of  
underexposure. It generates noise, and it can be critical at ISO 800.
Paul
>
> --- On Sat, 10/3/09, William Robb <warobb at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> From: William Robb <warobb at gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: DPR review of K-7
>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml at pdml.net>
>> Date: Saturday, October 3, 2009, 6:40 PM
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom C"
>> Subject: Re: DPR review of K-7
>>
>>
>> Yeah, as much as I've given reasons for not getting a K-7,
>> I still
>> might.  If the exposure control control was much
>> improved that could
>> make me happy for a while... and if I can sell a couple of
>> items on
>> e-bay, as Paul suggests, it could make it less of a hit.
>>
>> Let's see... if I order it Monday with expedited shipping
>> so that it
>> arrives on Wednesday when she's gone for the day... it'll
>> be just like
>> getting the K20D.  It looks like the *istD to her and
>> in her mind it
>> is. :-)
>>
>>
>> FWIW, the exposure accuracy of the K-7 does seem better
>> than the K10/K20, and the *istD (which I found to be really
>> bad).
>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML at pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
>> directly above and follow the directions.
>>
>
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML at pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
> and follow the directions.





More information about the PDML mailing list