DPR review of K-7

Jack Davis jdavisf8 at yahoo.com
Sat Oct 3 23:23:09 EDT 2009

Although I don't know what your specific exposure issue is, I have never shot in other than RAW, so am fine with a bit of under exposure. Much prefer to apply a slight +exposure nudge than deal with dreaded blown highlights.


--- On Sat, 10/3/09, William Robb <warobb at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: William Robb <warobb at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: DPR review of K-7
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml at pdml.net>
> Date: Saturday, October 3, 2009, 6:40 PM
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom C"
> Subject: Re: DPR review of K-7
> Yeah, as much as I've given reasons for not getting a K-7,
> I still
> might.  If the exposure control control was much
> improved that could
> make me happy for a while... and if I can sell a couple of
> items on
> e-bay, as Paul suggests, it could make it less of a hit.
> Let's see... if I order it Monday with expedited shipping
> so that it
> arrives on Wednesday when she's gone for the day... it'll
> be just like
> getting the K20D.  It looks like the *istD to her and
> in her mind it
> is. :-)
> FWIW, the exposure accuracy of the K-7 does seem better
> than the K10/K20, and the *istD (which I found to be really
> bad).
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML at pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
> directly above and follow the directions.


More information about the PDML mailing list