DPR review of K-7

paul stenquist pnstenquist at comcast.net
Sat Oct 3 08:25:06 EDT 2009

I had a K20D and a K10D. The K20D was my every day camera, and the  
K10D was a backup. When the K7 was introduced I bought one and sold  
the K10. Believe me, the K7D is a big step up from the K20. Exposure  
is much better, the faster write speed is a blessing, and the  
autofocus is superior in every situation I've encountered. I find it  
difficult to use the K20 these days, although it's fine for when I  
have to shoot with two cameras.
On Oct 3, 2009, at 3:47 AM, Chris Mitchell wrote:

>> John Francis wrote:
>>>  o K10D owners who passed on the K20 because it wasn't a big
>> upgrade.
>>>    (that probably includes quite a large number of folks, like me,
>>>    who started on digital with a *ist-D, and moved on to a K10D).
>> That would be me all right.
>> Boris
> Me too. That makes at least 3 of us so it looks like they got it right
> (until someone says that a sample of 3 isn't good enough  
> statistically of
> course).
> Chris
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML at pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
> and follow the directions.

More information about the PDML mailing list