DPR review of K-7
David J Brooks
pentkon52 at gmail.com
Sat Oct 3 06:19:21 EDT 2009
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 4:03 AM, AlunFoto <alunfoto at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/10/3 Tim Bray <tbray at textuality.com>:
>> On the other hand, it would appear that if if you've got a K20, the
>> K-7 gets you the exact same image quality, plus video, in a nicer
>> package. Which is a tough sell for $1000+.
> I agree. As long as we only measure the two cameras on image quality and video.
> If you include the other specs the toughness goes away.
I have no use for video, but faster AF would help me out a lot. I tend
to lose a lot of shots with the K10 do to its slow hunt and peck AF.
Thus the keeping of the Nikon stuff.
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML at pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
York Region, Ontario, Canada
More information about the PDML