DPR review of K-7

David J Brooks pentkon52 at gmail.com
Sat Oct 3 06:19:21 EDT 2009


On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 4:03 AM, AlunFoto <alunfoto at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/10/3 Tim Bray <tbray at textuality.com>:
>>
>> On the other hand, it would appear that if if you've got a K20, the
>> K-7 gets you the exact same image quality, plus video, in a nicer
>> package.  Which is a tough sell for $1000+.
>
> I agree. As long as we only measure the two cameras on image quality and video.
>
> If you include the other specs the toughness goes away.
>
> Jostein

I have no use for video, but faster AF would help me out a lot. I tend
to lose a lot of shots with the K10 do to its slow hunt and peck AF.
Thus the keeping of the Nikon stuff.

Dave
>
>
> --
> http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
> http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML at pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
>



-- 
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada




More information about the PDML mailing list