A bit embrassing?
Mark Roberts
msroberts01 at ysu.edu
Sun Mar 16 20:21:37 EDT 2008
John Francis wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 08:04:24PM -0400, Mark Roberts wrote:
>> David Savage wrote:
>>> At 08:44 AM 17/03/2008, pnstenquist at comcast.net wrote:
>>>> Some interesting threads came up today: In-camera autofocus vs. lens
>>>> dedicaed autofocus; improved continuous autofocus with the new
>>>> Pentax cameras and lenses. No much discussion followed either of
>>>> these. So what topic does the list fixate on: Whether Macs or PCs do
>>>> a better job of burning DVDs. Such silliness.
>>> LOL Soooo true.
>>>
>>> And I think you mean image stabilisation ;-)
>> Har!
>>
>> But there *was* one SLR that did in-camera autofocus. Can you name it?
>
> Would that be the Contax (the one that used the same sensor as the "MZ-D") ?
No sensor: It was a film camera, the Contax AX, that moved the film
plane to autofocus. That way they could achieve 100% backwards
compatibility with all their old lenses.
More information about the PDML
mailing list