Interesting ULA.

[P. J. Alling]

Perhaps you should tell that to the DA's and cities attempting to sue 
gun manufactures.  It seems the same logic should apply.  However one is 
a gun and one is a camera.  Then again the same logic applies...

Scott Loveless wrote:
> William Robb wrote:
>   
>> I doubt very much if it is enforcable.
>>
>> http://www.popphoto.com/cameras/4326/camera-test-fujifilm-finepix-is-1-a-narrowly-defined-user-licensing-agreement-page2.html
>>
>>     
> This is probably more of a CYA thing on Fuji's part.  As far as I'm 
> concerned, if I buy one it's mine.  What I do with it is none of Fuji's 
> business.  If I break the law or cause someone harm with it, then either 
> the State or the victim or both can attempt to exact some sort of 
> retribution.  Fuji has this nonsense in their EULA so that if I use the 
> IR capabilities of their "police" camera to cause harm to someone else, 
> it becomes difficult for me to point a blaming finger at Fuji.
>
>   


-- 
I am personally a member of the Cream of the Illuminati. 
A union with the Bavarian Illuminati is contemplated. 
When it is complete the Bavarian Cream Illuminati will rule the world
	-- Anonymous