Kodak to sell off film production?
Christine Aguila
caguila at earthlink.net
Fri Feb 8 20:02:37 EST 2008
From: "Scott Loveless" :
>I also missed the tactile aspects of film in
> general - putting slides in the trays, sleeving the negatives, etc.
> Editing on a computer screen sucks, at least for me. It's even less fun
> when I have to scan those slides and negatives, but at least I get to do
> the touchy-feely part of photography that I really like.
Yes, I miss the tactile aspects of film as well. There was something
wonderful about the darkroom. I've only public darkroom experience from
when I took 1 photography class over 20 years ago, but parts of that
experience I remember as if it were yesterday. Very enjoyable.
I'm liking Photoshop more and more, BUT processing my photographs digitally
results in just another thing I do on the computer. I'm at the computer so
much: work correspondence & work (and lots of it), music downloads, social
correspondence, and so much more. Because digital editing is yet 1 more
thing I do on the computer, just a tiny bit of the joy is taken out of the
experience. Because of this, I really try to get the photograph right
in-camera, so I don't have to spend hours at the computer. That's probably
a good thing for my photographic development.
Still, having said all that. I doubt I'd ever go back to film, though I do
eventually want to buy a used Pentax MX. That was my first SLR, purchased
for me by an old boyfriend, but I had to sell it when I was in college--the
ever present need for money. yuck. I have such fond memories of that
camera. This is totally a sentimental desire. For the most part, I see
myself as committed to digital.
Cheers, Christine
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Loveless" <pdml at twosixteen.com>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml at pdml.net>
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: Kodak to sell off film production?
> frank theriault wrote:
>> At one point in the fairly recent past I said I'd always use film, at
>> least on some level. I said that when I went digital I wouldn't stop
>> using film, that I'd continue to use my film cameras for "serious"
>> shooting as long as they continued to be functional.
>>
>> I got my *istD in (I think) April.
>>
>> Haven't bought a roll of film since.
>>
>> I took my Leica out one day and I think I only shot one or two frames
>> - "gosh, I can't just snap away at will, this is costing me money
>> now!" - and haven't used it since.
>>
>> I love film, still think it looks better (nothing beats TriX!) but I
>> can't see using it again.
>>
>> Didn't take long for me to make the full conversion. At least Kodak
>> waited for me to go digital before they decided to shut 'er down...
>>
> When Christie and I got the 750z I think I made a statement along the
> lines of "I don't see a need for color film, anymore." Christie got a
> K100D right after they came out and I started reaching for that for
> quick snapshots. (I still do.) Shortly thereafter I got a K10D and
> used that exclusively for several months. I certainly can't complain
> about the camera.
>
> What I missed was the black and white process. Saint Ansel referred to
> it as "donkey work". I also missed the tactile aspects of film in
> general - putting slides in the trays, sleeving the negatives, etc.
> Editing on a computer screen sucks, at least for me. It's even less fun
> when I have to scan those slides and negatives, but at least I get to do
> the touchy-feely part of photography that I really like. I no longer own
> the K10D.
>
> I suppose the end result should be the driving factor, and that the
> stuff in the middle shouldn't really matter. But for me that part in
> the middle is the most fun. I'll try the digital thing again when
> traditional black and white film, chemicals, and paper becomes too
> inconvenient to purchase.
>
> --
> Scott Loveless
> http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML at pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>
More information about the PDML
mailing list