When is a little Photoshoppery too much Photoshoppery?

[Christine Aguila]

From: "Brian Walters" <supera1000 at fastmail.fm>
>
> The second one was more drastic and involved removal of a stump on the
> left.  This was suggested by Paul, and others seemed to agree that it
> was acceptable (and an improvement).  Ann, however, thought I'd gone too
> far. In retrospect, I think Ann is probably right in this case.  I have
> changed what is there and, as I intend using the image in a 'River
> Environs' project, I probably should use the original for that project.

Brian:  Without knowing the overall purpose of the River Enviorns' Project & 
how specifically the stump photograph contributes to the purpose of this 
project, it would be difficult for me to give a specific answer in this 
case--but I'd probably agree with your general point about contextual usage.

In general, I'd probably just say, when the facts are crucial, place your 
loyalty in the shot as seen.  When fancy is the point, go ahead and ride the 
wings of the fairies!

Cheers, Christine