DA70 and 24x36 coverage

[David Savage]

<http://www.digital.pentax.co.jp/en/lens/>

I think "Digital SLRs Only" is pretty un-ambiguous given that Pentax 
doesn't make a FF digital SLR.

Dave


At 02:06 AM 3/10/2007, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
>I agree, the designation should be for APS only coverage
>if so, otherwise unmarked could be assumed FF.
>jco
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: pdml-bounces at pdml.net [mailto:pdml-bounces at pdml.net] On Behalf Of
>Tom C
>Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 1:32 PM
>To: pdml at pdml.net
>Subject: RE: DA70 and 24x36 coverage
>
>
>I'm confused. :-)
>
>There's a ton of FF lenses on the market and they're not marked, and
>never
>will be.  Now if the ones that were only truly APS were marked *APS*,
>that
>could be a good thing.
>
>It's really not complicated or confusing.  If you know how to use a
>camera
>with any degree of skill, and are willing to spend money on a new lens,
>then
>this issue is certainly a no-brainer.
>
>Much simpler than determining what size of wheel and tire are compatible
>
>with a given vehicle.
>
>Tom C.