How about Pentax M 135/3.5 and M 200/4.0?

[Jens Bladt]

Quite sure. A was careful focusing correctly. But there's alwayas a chance
that tests can be better.
Anyway, the sharpness of the M4/200mm shot, cant' be a focusing mistake!,
can it?

Jens Bladt

Latest photographs: http://flickr.com/photos/bladt/
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: pdml-bounces at pdml.net [mailto:pdml-bounces at pdml.net]Pa vegne af Peter
Lacus
Sendt: 28. februar 2007 22:03
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: How about Pentax M 135/3.5 and M 200/4.0?


Jens,

> I have a M 4/200mm as well. I have tested it against some fine lenses,
like
> the FA* 2.8/80-200mm
> It's  better than I thought it would be:
>
> http://jensbladt.dk/Test/images/200mm56-small/0830-PM-200-56.jpg
> http://jensbladt.dk/Test/images/200mm56-small/1197-PTX-200mm-F56.jpg

wow, that's quite a difference, are you sure it wasn't caused by auto
focus or something?

Cheers,

Peter

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML at pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.4/705 - Release Date: 02/27/2007
15:24

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.5/706 - Release Date: 02/28/2007
16:09