22 MPix digital MF under 10000$

[Adam Maas]

Considering that the 645D was most likely using K10D-based electronics 
changed only enough to handle the Kodak sensor(which is significantly 
larger than 24x36), that would gain us exactly what?

-Adam


Tom C wrote:
> If it were me, assuming that a reasonable profit margin could be realized, 
> I'd revamp the 645D guts and put them in a K10D style body and attempt to 
> sell a high end DSLR that uses regular K-mount lenses.  I would guess that 
> there's a larger potential customer base for that than for a 645D.
>
> Tom C.
>
>
>   
>> From: "P. J. Alling" <webster26 at mindspring.com>
>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml at pdml.net>
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml at pdml.net>
>> Subject: Re: 22 MPix digital MF under 10000$
>> Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 14:49:59 -0400
>>
>> Actually the assumption is that the 645D is canceled, based on what I'd
>> call Pentax's "Wiggle on the Hook" plan.  We really don't know anything 
>> yet.
>>
>> Christian wrote:
>>     
>>> Wilko Bulte wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 01:04:41PM +0200, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote..
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> Yes, it is reality, with stanrard lens:
>>>>> http://www.mamiya.com/cameras.asp?id=1&id2=2281
>>>>> I think we can be sure that integrated Pentax 645D using similar
>>>>> sized CCD would be even cheaper... Now if only Hoya would allow
>>>>> Pentax team to release 645D...
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> Assuming the 645D is ready for volume production.  Do we know that for
>>>> a fact?
>>>>
>>>> Wilko
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> Umm, news is that the 645D has been canceled.
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> --
>> All dogs have four legs; my cat has four legs. Therefore, my cat is a dog.
>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML at pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>     
>
>
>
>