"New" T/C's?

[Doug Franklin]

John Francis wrote:

> Don't you believe it.  Note that this was a 120-300/f2.8, not f/4.
> It would probably weigh about as much as all the lenses you list.

Well, since it would displace the 200/2.8 and 300/4.5, and get me to
f/2.8 for focal lengths I don't currently have it, I'd probably put up
with it.  I was willing to put up with the 80-200/2.8 on film ...

-- 
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)