"New" T/C's?
Jens Bladt
jens.bladt at webspeed.dk
Tue Jan 30 17:01:10 EST 2007
Some very nice shots, Bruce!.
Not a bad lens combination.
I especially love the one with the jets in a row - and the smoke stripe
behind the planes. Brilliant.
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: pdml-bounces at pdml.net [mailto:pdml-bounces at pdml.net]Pa vegne af Bruce
Dayton
Sendt: 30. januar 2007 19:12
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: "New" T/C's?
I have the Sigma 100-300/4 and the Sigma 1.4X EX combination. It is
quite good. The lens is very nice and works well with the converter.
This entire gallery was shot with that combination:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/Galleries/Blue%20Angels/index.htm
I have used the Kenko 1.5 SHX and the Tamron 1.4 AF converters and
they are not as good as the Sigma.
--
Bruce
Tuesday, January 30, 2007, 7:17:36 AM, you wrote:
PG> Talking of T/Cs I've been debating whether to wait for the 60 - 250 or
PG> get the sigma 70-200 f/2.8 + 1.4x TC combo or possibly the 100-300 f/4
PG> + 1.4x TC
PG> I know that the 70-200 f/2.8 enjoys a good reputation but i know
PG> nothing about their t/c... Any opinions on the combination ?
PG> What about the 100-300 f/4 + 1.4 t/c ?
PG> Regards
PG> Patrick
PG> On 1/30/07, Jan van Wijk <pentax at dfsee.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 06:21:48 -0800 (PST), Jack Davis wrote:
>>
>> >Am hankering for the yet to be released 60~250 UCM and an "L" quality
>> >T/C. Any rumblings of a development or release schedule for such?
>>
>> Not that I know of.
>>
>> I would love to see a new high quality 1.4x converter too,
>> would be real nice if it also translated the focallength as
>> sent to the camera ...
>>
>> (Or we need an addition function in the firmware to enter that :-)
>>
>>
>> There are a few (old) third-party TC's that have the power-contacts
>> needed for the UCM (or is it SSM ?) new 'supersonic motor' lenses.
>> Optical quality is quite bad on those though ...
>>
>>
>> Regards, JvW
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Jan van Wijk; http://www.dfsee.com/gallery
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML at pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
PG> --
PG> Regards
PG> Patrick Genovese
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML at pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.15/659 - Release Date: 01/30/2007
09:31
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.15/659 - Release Date: 01/30/2007
09:31
More information about the PDML
mailing list