*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?

[John Whittingham]

> I found the multi-segment metering in the ist-D to be very good - I 
> started using it even though I'd been a lifelong 
> centerweighted-metering photographer up until then.
> 
> But I've found the multi-segment metering in the K10D to be even 
> better. I hardly ever use centerweighted any more.

Switched to multi-segment with the MZ-3, found it to be accurate and 
consistent although I would occasionally use spot metering fot tricky 
lighting situations. Up until then I only ever had centre-weighted or a hand 
held Weston Master V, I think I still have the Weston in a camera bag 
somewhere.

John 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed and may contain
confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an email in error please notify Carmel College
on info at carmel.ac.uk then delete all copies of it from your systems.

Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and email attachments for viruses we cannot
guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any responsibility for viruses.

Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for inappropriate content, the college cannot
be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author.
The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College and Carmel College cannot be held
responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a message.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------