*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?

[Digital Image Studio]

On 11/02/07, Mark Roberts <msroberts01 at ysu.edu> wrote:
> I found the multi-segment metering in the ist-D to be very good - I
> started using it even though I'd been a lifelong
> centerweighted-metering photographer up until then.
>
> But I've found the multi-segment metering in the K10D to be even
> better. I hardly ever use centerweighted any more.
>
> Old dog. New tricks. Who'da thunk?

Exactly the same here, shooting RAW using matrix metering on the *ist
D lead to a very high percentage of good exposures.

-- 
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
pdml at swiftdsl.com.au
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998