*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?

[John Francis]

I was a convert back in the PZ-1p days; it handled tricky
lighting situations with consumate ease (especially when
balancing ambient and flash exposure).


On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 08:18:19PM -0500, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> That mirrors my experience. I was either center weighted TTL or  
> incident meter hand held. But the D and the K10D have made me a fan  
> of multi-segment.
> Paul
> On Feb 10, 2007, at 7:29 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> 
> > I found the multi-segment metering in the ist-D to be very good - I
> > started using it even though I'd been a lifelong
> > centerweighted-metering photographer up until then.
> >
> > But I've found the multi-segment metering in the K10D to be even
> > better. I hardly ever use centerweighted any more.
> >
> > Old dog. New tricks. Who'da thunk?
> >
> >
> > -- 
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > PDML at pdml.net
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML at pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net