*ist-Ds Vs. K10D image quality?
Godfrey DiGiorgi
godders at mac.com
Sat Feb 3 10:07:07 EST 2007
Sandisk standard SD cards are 45x rating. Ultra II models (they're
clearly labeled) are 60x and Extreme III models (again clearly
labeled) are 133x.
For someone who who had an issue with camera speed at one time in the
past, it seems a little incongruous that you didn't buy a card to
exploit the speed of the K10D. With a Sandisk Ultra II card,
capturing in RAW/DNG will write almost literally as fast as you can
press the shutter release for individual exposures. An Extreme IIi is
even faster.
Write performance tests of Transcend 45x, Sandisk Ultre II and
Transcend 150x.
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/Pentax-DS-150x-timing/
Extreme III is faster than Transcend 150x.
Godfrey
On Feb 3, 2007, at 4:49 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:
> I'm not sure what it is. I only have one SD card so far. I sold the
> ones I
> had, with the *ist DL.
> It's a 2 GB Sandisk. I think it's called Standard, High Speed -
> which is -
> anything but fast :-)
> I know, that it (or the camera) made me wait, when I was shooting the
> panorama sequence earlier today.
> I will probably make it a habit to shoot JPEG's when ever write
> speed is
> crutial, at least until I get a Sandsik Extreeme III card, next
> time I need
> more capasity :-)
More information about the PDML
mailing list