Denied

[graywolf]

Chuckle

Graywolf
Website: http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Blog:    http://www.graywolfphoto.com/journal/

David J Brooks wrote:
> On Dec 1, 2007 1:24 PM, graywolf <gray_wolf at charter.net> wrote:
>  At least in the days of chemical prints you could move the image into the
>> proper light if you were a perfectionist.
> 
> I just move my monitor to the proper light.:-)
> 
> Dave
>> Graywolf
>> Website: http://www.graywolfphoto.com
>> Blog:    http://www.graywolfphoto.com/journal/
>>
>>
>> Bob Sullivan wrote:
>>> Bruce,
>>>
>>> It's not just equipment, it's viewing conditions as well.
>>> I see less subtle dark details here than I do in the basement.
>>> Here I use my laptop with a 3 pane sliding glass door right behind me
>>> - north light.
>>> In the basement I'm a troglidite.  Weak 60 watt lights in the ceiling
>>> leaves it dark!
>>> You see different things on the 20 inch LCD in the basement.
>>>
>>> And as before, I like the photo.  The crescent moon is an eye magnet!
>>>
>>> Regards,  Bob S.
>>>
>>> On Dec 1, 2007 10:33 AM, Bruce Dayton <bkdayton at daytonphoto.com> wrote:
>>>> An interesting issue brings itself forward when the voting is so open
>>>> like this.  There have been quite a few photos shown on this list
>>>> (including a few of mine) where some of the members can't see the
>>>> deeper shadows - essentially a hardware problem - could be calibration
>>>> or just problem monitors.  So when a photo is voted on, not only are
>>>> you at the mercy of the voters, but if their monitors don't/can't show
>>>> the subtle details, your image could get panned.  A fairly recent one
>>>> of mine shown here did just that.  http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/ptreyes_0137a.htm
>>>> Based on the list response, I thought this one would make it.  There
>>>> were some responders on the list here who could not see the foreground
>>>> details and thought there was too much black in the foreground.
>>>>
>>>> What I am getting at, is that the odds of a subtle image making it
>>>> through now is even harder because of variance of equipment being used
>>>> to view the photos for judging.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Bruce
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Friday, November 30, 2007, 4:57:57 PM, you wrote:
>>>>
>>>> DJB> On Nov 30, 2007 7:51 PM, P. J. Alling
>>>> DJB> <webster26 at mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>>>> I know why they were rejected, too subtle.
>>>> DJB> Meaning, crappy.:-)
>>>>
>>>> DJB> Dave
>>>>>> David J Brooks wrote:
>>>>>>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5076840
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The other.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dave
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Nov 30, 2007 9:30 AM, Doug Brewer <dbrewer at richmond.ky.us> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> any chance we can see these photos?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> David J Brooks wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> After reading a few of the latest Pentax Gallery threads, i decided to
>>>>>>>>> enter two of my best like photos, as decided by me and others
>>>>>>>>> comments.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I checked the site today and they have been rejected.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> At least i have my original four still there.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dave
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>>>>> PDML at pdml.net
>>>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
>>>>>> above and follow the directions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> The difference between individual intelligence and group
>>>>>> intelligence is the difference between Harvard University and the
>>>>>> Harvard University football team.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         -- P. J. O'Roark
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>>> PDML at pdml.net
>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
>>>>>> above and follow the directions.
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> DJB> --
>>>> DJB> Equine Photography
>>>> DJB> www.caughtinmotion.com
>>>> DJB> http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
>>>> DJB> Ontario Canada
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> PDML at pdml.net
>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
>>>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML at pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
>>
> 
> 
>