67 lens question

[Bruce Dayton]

At one point I had two 67II's and a bunch of lenses.  I opted for a
new 90/2.8 at the time.  I preferred a slightly wider normal rather
than the 105/2.4 slightly longer normal.  I also had the 75/4.5 - just
a little slower than I cared for as a heavily used lens.  So I would
recommend the 90/2.8 - although none of the lenses are bad.

-- 
Bruce


Thursday, August 30, 2007, 2:46:57 PM, you wrote:

MR> The 67 I've bought is coming without a lens and I'l looking for 
MR> recommendations about a choice of normal lens. I seem to recall that
MR> the 105/2.4 is better regarded than the 90/2.8, but I think I'd still
MR> prefer the shorter focal length, personally. An alternative I'd 
MR> consider would be a 75mm f/4.5, although it's a bit slow for a normal
MR> lens. Any comments on any of this? Other suggestions?