67 lens question

[Paul Stenquist]

Both the 105 and the 98 have their supporters and detractors. I have  
the 105 and have been very happy with it. But if you would like to go  
wider, the 75/2.8 appears to be a fabulous lens. That was Aaron's  
favorite, and most of the pics he posted here were shot with that  
lens. However, it's only a few years old, so is pricier than the  
others. I would avoid the 75/4.5. The reviews are very mixed. Perhaps  
there is sample variation, and it may well be telling that Pentax  
chose to replace it with an upgraded lens.
Paul
Paul
On Aug 30, 2007, at 5:46 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:

> The 67 I've bought is coming without a lens and I'l looking for
> recommendations about a choice of normal lens. I seem to recall that
> the 105/2.4 is better regarded than the 90/2.8, but I think I'd still
> prefer the shorter focal length, personally. An alternative I'd
> consider would be a 75mm f/4.5, although it's a bit slow for a normal
> lens. Any comments on any of this? Other suggestions?
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML at pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net