300mm 2.8 AF: Sigma vs Pentax

[David Savage]

I have many levels of suckiness.

Cheers,

Dave

On 8/14/07, P. J. Alling <webster26 at mindspring.com> wrote:
> You suck even more than I thought possible...
>
> David Savage wrote:
> > On 8/14/07, William Robb <warobb at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Kenneth Waller"
> >> Subject: Re: 300mm 2.8 AF: Sigma vs Pentax
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> FWIW -
> >>>
> >>> I have the FA 300mm f4.5, Its a wonderful lens even if it doesn't have a
> >>> tripod mount.
> >>>
> >>> Unless you absolutely, positively need the extra light a 2.8 aperture
> >>> provides, I find it very hard to justify the extra cost of the 2.8 300mm
> >>> over the 4.5 300mm.
> >>>
> >> Which 300/4.5 do I have? It must be the F. Mine has a tripod mount, and is
> >> wonderfully small, smaller than my FA200/4 macro.
> >>
> >
> > I have the FA version:
> >
> > <http://picasaweb.google.com/OzSavage/Misc/photo?authkey=TrIZRqTedfw#5096341721848299026>
> >
> > It's the one on the left.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Dave