300mm 2.8 AF: Sigma vs Pentax

[P. J. Alling]

You suck even more than I thought possible...

David Savage wrote:
> On 8/14/07, William Robb <warobb at gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Kenneth Waller"
>> Subject: Re: 300mm 2.8 AF: Sigma vs Pentax
>>
>>
>>     
>>> FWIW -
>>>
>>> I have the FA 300mm f4.5, Its a wonderful lens even if it doesn't have a
>>> tripod mount.
>>>
>>> Unless you absolutely, positively need the extra light a 2.8 aperture
>>> provides, I find it very hard to justify the extra cost of the 2.8 300mm
>>> over the 4.5 300mm.
>>>       
>> Which 300/4.5 do I have? It must be the F. Mine has a tripod mount, and is
>> wonderfully small, smaller than my FA200/4 macro.
>>     
>
> I have the FA version:
>
> <http://picasaweb.google.com/OzSavage/Misc/photo?authkey=TrIZRqTedfw#5096341721848299026>
>
> It's the one on the left.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave
>
>   


-- 
cognoscenti: "Those who know"

cognesnotty: The stringy material that forms in the nasal passages of "Those who know."