Available light wedding

[japilado at pacifier.com]

I use my 645 with the LS 75mm and the 55mm.  I also use a Pentax 400 T
strobe.  I purchased the LS 75 so I could have a higher sync speed when
shooting flash outdoors.  I take an incident light metering of the scene
and set my shutter speed and f-stop.  I use the 400 T for fill flash.  I
"power down" the light output to balance the ambient light with the
strobe.
If shooting inside a church,  I meter using the camera's system.  I set my
400T to TTL Auto and attach it to the camera via that special Pentax synch
cord.  I get very good balance between the flash and the church's ambient
light.
For my candids,  I use a Pentax LX and a Leica M2.  I shoot film because
I'm most comfortable with it because I have done weddings for many years.

Jim A.





> Hi there,
> I'm relatively new to this list, but I would like to ask about a
> scenario I have not been able to find much discussion about in the
> archives.
>
> I nearly always use available light in my photographs, and I still use
> film. I do work for a weekly newspaper and use a Nikon DSLR as time
> restraints and deadlines dictate, but my love is shooting with my pair
> of Pentax MXs and soon, a Pentax 645, which will replace my Mamiya C33
> as my primary medium format rig. (I also have a few Brownie Hawkeyes and
> a Graflex 22 TLR that round out my low-budget yet fun to use MF gear.)
>
> To the scenario... I have been commissioned by some acquaintances to
> shoot their wedding this fall. Ceremony will be outdoors, mid September,
> at 4:30 p.m. at a mountaintop resort in West Virginia. (About three
> hours before sunset, according to the US Naval Observatory.)
>
> Weather permitting, it should be a beautiful event, the light that time
> of year is wonderful, and the backdrop will be a panorama of mountains
> with leaves beginning to change.
>
> I'm also being asked to photograph the first hour of the reception,
> which will be indoors, in a typical banquet hall setting at the
> resort--the luminescent and aesthetic antithesis of the ceremony. Guests
> are being provided with disposable cameras for the remainder of the
> reception.
>
> Browsing this list's archives and a number of other respected forums, I
> see the vast majority of folks shoot weddings using zooms (typically
> ~28-70 and ~80-200) and flash (often using a stroboframe or similar
> bracket). My style, as mentioned before, however, is natural light and a
> collection of prime lenses, excluding my "new" SMC-A 35-105mm f3.5.
>
> While it's not the way the majority of folks shoot weddings, this couple
> approached me because they like my work. (And I've offered a reasonable
> fee, since this is my first wedding gig. I warned them of the risk of my
> inexperience, encouraged them to shop around for other photographers,
> they did, and they came back to me.)
>
> I'm rather inspired to see that until recently, Jeff Ascough was
> shooting by available light and on film, with Leicas, of course, rather
> than the much under-rated MX. ;)  He has since gone digital.
>
> The glass I plan to use includes the SMC-M 50mm 1.4, an Elicar 90mm 2.5,
> and I'd like to pick up a SMC-M 34mm f2 for something wide, fast and
> affordable that won't distort group shots. For the 645 I have the 75mm
> and the 45mm. I may consider picking up the 150mm. This camera will
> probably be relegated to the formal portraits, as I think the MX is more
> suited to the PJ coverage of the wedding and reception, being
> inconspicuous and less intimidating to people on the other end of the
> glass.
>
> I'd like to hear folks' thoughts on lenses appropriate for the job, film
> recommendations for such a scenario (I'm thinking Portra 160 and 400 --
> likely 800 for the reception and Ilford XP2 Super), and if I'm being a
> crazy for eschewing flash.
>
> I look forward to hearing what folks have to say.
>
> Thanks,
> Drew
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML at pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>