Cheapskate Challenge

[P. J. Alling]

Good exposures shouldn't require a lot of manipulation.  The point is 
can you do good work without a lot of expensive software.  It appears 
that the answer is yes.

William Robb wrote:
> Ok, here's 3 that went straight to the web from photographic media with 
> little or no manipulation, mostly because I didn't know what the heck I was 
> doing.
>
> This was shot on Kodachome film, scanned with an HP Photosmart S10 scanner, 
> sized and saved as a jpeg using Adobe PhotoDeluxe, which came with my Umax 
> scanner.
> http://pug.komkon.org/01sep/Hosta.html
>
> This was shot on the 6x7, and probably scanned from the contact sheet on my 
> Umax scanner using the supplied PhotoDeluxe software
> http://pug.komkon.org/02apr/maria.html
>
> This would have been shot on some sort of colour neg film and scanned on my 
> Umax using PhotoDeluxe.
> http://pug.komkon.org/02jun/virginia.html
>
>
> William Robb 
>
>
>   


-- 
Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot.