2007 Lens Roadmap In English
David Savage
ozsavage at gmail.com
Thu Sep 21 19:29:15 EST 2006
Considering that they're DFA, I expect it will be a similar situation
to the DFA 50 & 100mm f2.8 macros. "Optimised for digital" FA
versions.
Probably based on the FA 200mm f2.8 & FA 300mm f4.5 (Though I would
prefer the f2.8 version)
Dave
On 9/21/06, Adam Maas <mykroft at mykroft.com> wrote:
> That's my hope. And at least at f1.4, maybe even a 1.2.
>
> -Adam
>
>
> John Forbes wrote:
> > It is interesting that the 200 and 300 lenses are D FA, not DA. Pity no
> > apertures are noted for the later lenses. The 55mm harks back to Takumar
> > days, and might perhaps become a portrait lens to rival the 85mm lenses.
More information about the PDML
mailing list