10 meg vs 6 meg

[Stan Halpin]

I look forward to the larger pixel density primarily for the cropping 
potential. But, even without the "larger" size sensor, I would probably 
get it fo rthe SR alone. Add in the other subtle refinements, like the 
ability to manually control whether the camera is drawing power from 
the batteries in the camera or in the grip, and it was a no-brainer for 
me. And as an extra added bonus, no longer needing to try to pronounce 
*ist-D!

Stan

On Oct 29, 2006, at 7:20 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:

> On Oct 29, 2006, at 14:18, graywolf wrote:
>> Graywolf's rule: Don't spend your money until performance will double.
>> Of course, if you want the features that the more costly item has, you
>> pay your money and enjoy those features, but you will not notice
>> much of
>> a performance gain.
>>
>
> I can't speak for anyone else, but I know that I want the K10D for
> all of the *other* features it has.  I'd buy it even if it were
> "only" 6.1 MP like the previous models.
>
> Droooollll.....
>
>
>   -Charles
>
> --
> Charles Robinson
> charlesr at visi.com
> Minneapolis, MN
> http://charles.robinsontwins.org
>
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML at pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>