70~210 F vs A
Mark Cassino
markcassino at yahoo.com
Thu Nov 23 12:42:36 EST 2006
Hi Igor -
I missed the first part of this thread, but...
Some time ago I owned a Takumar F 70-200. Although the
Takumar F's are considered a budget lens, the sample I
had was remarkably fine. I sold it to a list member
who also commented that it was one of the best lenses
he ever owned.
Maybe I jsut had a great sample, but I'd try a Takumar
F again if I needed a lens in this range.
- MCC
--- Igor Roshchin <str at komkon.org> wrote:
> Just in case: I do not see any of the said lenses at
> KEH right now.
> There is a bunch of 70-200 F and one 70-210 F4-5.6
> TAKUMAR F -
> Both are as far as I understand are completely
> different beasts from
> those you are asking about (that's why they are
> cheap),
> and IIRC, at least the latter one is not SMC.
--------------------------
Mark Cassino Photography
Kalamamazoo, MI
www.markcassino.com
--------------------------
____________________________________________________________________________________
Want to start your own business?
Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/r-index
More information about the PDML
mailing list