Using a Super Tak w/ istDS- A challange to the list?

[P. J. Alling]

Truth is never a matter of opinion, truth is a matter of fact.  Opinion 
is often the only thing used to discern fact from fiction.

Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Unfortunately, truth is often a matter of opinion. And sometimes  
> grownups and gentlemen have to agree to disagree.
> Paul
> On Nov 12, 2006, at 10:59 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
>
>   
>> Its not a matter of "winning" an argument, its
>> a metter of standing up for right and wrong
>> or true and false. Im not posting to "win",
>> Im posting to set the truth on the matter(s).
>> This list isnt a place for contests.
>> jco
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: pdml-bounces at pdml.net [mailto:pdml-bounces at pdml.net] On  
>> Behalf Of
>> Paul Stenquist
>> Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 1:15 PM
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Subject: Re: Using a Super Tak w/ istDS- A challange to the list?
>>
>>
>> I don't think anyone has to go so far as to filter the threads,
>> although to each their own.  I've never filtered anyone, and I'm none
>> the worse for the experience. But it think we all know that there's a
>> point where it doesn't make sense to continue with posts addressed
>> directly to anyone who feels they have to win an argument. I've been
>> guilty of it with several people here over the years, but it's just
>> unproductive.
>> Paul
>> On Nov 12, 2006, at 9:47 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> You're probably right, but all I was trying to do was add a little
>>> levity
>>> to the situation.  Perhaps in another case the lightness of my post
>>> would
>>> have been seen and appreciated.  And that, my friend, is another
>>> aspect of
>>> having discussions with JCO - there's no way to use levity or humor.
>>>
>>> It's probably best for all involved that I just filter every thread
>>> that
>>> involves JCO ... I'm sure it'll be my loss, but there are other
>>> sources of
>>> valuable information available here and on the 'net.
>>>
>>> Shel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>>>> [Original Message]
>>>> From: Paul Stenquist
>>>>         
>>>> I'm sorry, but this is unnecessary provocation.
>>>>
>>>> On Nov 11, 2006, at 11:11 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> <ROTFLMAO>  What kind of convoluted double-speak is that?!
>>>>>
>>>>> Shel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> JCO wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>>  I am saying your wrong in the concept
>>>>>> of that reply post of yours. Someone
>>>>>> may think they just disagree but if their concept
>>>>>> is invalid to my contention than thats another
>>>>>> matter altogether and I won't just "let it drop"
>>>>>> because it implies that your post is somehow
>>>>>> a valid rebuttal/opinion when its not if it is
>>>>>> irrelavant to my contention.
>>>>>>             
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>> PDML at pdml.net
>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>>           
>>>> --
>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> PDML at pdml.net
>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>         
>>>
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> PDML at pdml.net
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>       
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML at pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML at pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>     
>
>
>