PESO: November Moon

[Patrice LACOUTURE (GMail)]

"""
Enlarged moon double exposure is, perhaps, the ultimate cliche in
photography, but, it seems, I have no shame.
"""

Yep, but I've seen far worse instances of it...

This is a great picture IMHO. Anyone got better results with Photoshop?

Patrice

Jack Davis a écrit :
> A couple of details. Shot about 20 frames of the moon with A*300 f/2.8,
> 1.4L T/C and 85B filter. (from my back patio)
> Rewound the 20 frames in the LX (great feature), removed the 1.4L T/C
> and, next day, headed for a local State Wildlife Refuge. Taken at about
> noon.
> Underexposed geese by 3 stops (2 by - exposure comp. and one by
> shooting 100 ISO Provia at ISO 200). Left the 85B in place.
> This small jpg produces some nodes (?) on the edge of the moon.
> Something I haven't see before. They do disappear with zoom in.
> Would liked to have had the full frame width, but the moon was too near
> the center, thus the 8x10 crop.
> Enlarged moon double exposure is, perhaps, the ultimate cliche in
> photography, but, it seems, I have no shame.
>
> Jack
>
> Comments certainly appreciated.
>
> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=198
>
>
>
>
>  
> __________________________________________________________________________________________
> Check out the New Yahoo! Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. 
> (http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta) 
>
>
>